In the News

Ethanol Producer Magazine

Aug 8, 2024

The U.S. exported 145.87 million gallons of ethanol and 645,592 metric tons of distillers grains in June, according to data released by the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service on Aug. 6. Exports of both products were up when compared to June 2023.

The 145.67 million gallons of ethanol exported in June was down slightly from the 154.39 million gallons exported the previous month, but up when compared to the 111.1 million gallons exported in June of last year. 

The U.S. exported ethanol to more than three dozen countries in June. Canada was the top destination for U.S. ethanol exports at 44.74 million gallons, followed by the U.K. at 25.77 million gallons and India at 14.73 million gallons. 

The value of U.S. ethanol exports reached $339.75 million in June, up from $332.99 million in May and $313.04 million in June 203. 

Total U.S. ethanol exports for the first half of the year reached 962.76 million gallons at a value of $2.16 billion, compared to 684.35 million gallons exported during the same period of last year at a value of $1.91 billion. 

The 945,592 metric tons of distillers grains exported in June was down when compared to the 1.01 million metric tons exported the previous month, but up slightly from the 943,740 metric tons exported in June 2023.

The U.S. exported distillers grains to approximately 43 countries in June. Mexico was the top destination for U.S. distillers grains exports at 200,900 metric tons, followed by South Korea at 116,222 metric tons and Indonesia at 100,967 metric tons. 

The value of U.S. distillers grain exports reached $246.28 million in June, down from $262.97 million the previous month and $302.31 million in June of last year. 

Total U.S. distillers grains exports for the first half of 2024 reached 5.87 million metric tons at a value of $1.62 billion, compared to 5.09 million metric tons exported during the same period of 2023 at a value of $1.68 billion. 

Additional data is available on the USDA FAS website

Read the original story here.

Fluid Quip Technologies

Jul 30, 2024

Fluid Quip Technologies (FQT) today announced the successful completion and commissioning of the world’s largest MSC™ System to date at Tharaldson Ethanol’s 175 million-gallon biorefinery in Casselton, North Dakota. This marks the twelfth FQT MSC™ system installed world-wide and expands the production of corn fermented protein, a high-quality protein ingredient in animal feed, providing superior nutrition solutions for pet, aquaculture and other animal feed markets which has up to a 40% lower carbon-intensity than competing products.

“Our MSC™ Technology is critical to not only creating a high-quality protein ingredient for pet food, but also allowing ethanol plants to achieve greater corn oil yields” said Neal Jakel, President of Fluid Quip Technologies, “FQT is excited to commission our largest MSC™ System and continue to collaborate with our customers to maximize the value of every kernel of corn.  The project is a testament to the market and value the team has achieved as nutrition customers look for more corn fermented protein to utilize in their rations.”

Fluid Quip Technologies provided the MSC™ Technology as well as the engineering, design, procurement, construction management and startup services for the project. The completion of this MSC™ System brings overall production capacity of FQT MSC™ protein products to over 750,000 tons per year.  The thirteenth FQT MSC™ system is currently under construction at the Ensus UK Limited’s facility in the UK.

About Fluid Quip Technologies

Fluid Quip Technologies® (FQT) is a premier technology and process engineering firm based in Cedar Rapids, IA, USA. FQT was founded on extensive experience and know-how within the corn wet milling and dry grind ethanol industries. FQT’s skilled engineering and technical leadership has been developing new technologies and process solutions applicable to the biofuels and biochemical markets for more than 30 years. For more information, visit www.fluidquiptechnologies.com.

Read the original press release here

Ethanol Producer Magazine

Jul 31, 2024

U.S. fuel ethanol production reached a record high of 1.109 million barrels per day the week ending July 26, up slightly from the previous record of 11.08 million barrels per day set late 2017, according to data released by the U.S. Energy Information Administration on July 31. Both fuel ethanol production and stocks were up 1% when compared to the previous week, while exports were up 2%. 

Fuel ethanol production averaged 1.109 million barrels per day the week ending July 26, up 14,000 barrels per day when compared to the 1.095 million barrels of production reported for the previous week. When compared to the same week of last year, production for the week ending July 26 was up 42,000 barrels per day. 

Weekly ending stocks of fuel ethanol reached 23.973 million barrels, up 250,000 barrels when compared to the 23.723 million barrels of stocks reported for the previous week. When compared to the same week of last year, stocks for the week ending July 26 were up 1.113 million barrels. 

Exports of fuel ethanol averaged 58,000 barrels per day the week ending July 26, up 1,000 barrels per day when compared to the 57,000 barrels per day of exports reported for the previous week. When compared to the same week of last year, exports for the week ending July 26 were down 83,000 barrels per day. No fuel ethanol imports were reported for the week ending July 26.

Read the original story here

Republican Eagle

Jul 19, 2024

An opinion piece published in the Republican Eagle on July 12 by the Lake Pepin Legacy Alliance presented a one-sided view of the environmental benefits of ethanol and mislead readers into believing that ethanol is not a climate-friendly alternative to petroleum  (“Maintain Climate Guardrails in Farm Bill”).

Contrary to the assertion in the piece, research from federal agencies including the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Department of Agriculture have confirmed that ethanol is a low-carbon fuel with 40-50 percent less emissions than petroleum on a lifecycle basis.

The 2022 study cited by the authors to claim that ethanol is worse for the climate has been debunked by climate scientists upon peer review. Those researchers noted that the discredited study made “questionable assumptions,” “double counted” emissions, and used “outdated and inaccurate projections” to come to a biased conclusion against ethanol.In reality, ethanol not only reduces greenhouse gas emissions but also replaces toxic aromatic compounds in gasoline and reduces carcinogenic emissions like benzene, toluene, xylene, and other hydrocarbons that increase the risk of cancer, according to research conducted by the Minnesota-based Hormel Institute.

Had the authors undertaken a comprehensive review of the science, they would have found that the evidence overwhelmingly shows that ethanol has positive climate and human health benefits.

While we may not see eye-to-eye on that point, we agree with the authors on the need to maintain climate funding in the Farm Bill as a way to further assist Minnesota growers in implementing conservation practices like cover crops and no-till farming that will sequester more carbon in the soil, reduce runoff, and lower the carbon intensity of ethanol on a lifecycle basis. 

We look forward to working with them, and our congressional federal delegation, to support Minnesota’s environment and economy through a timely Farm Bill reauthorization. 

Brian Werner

Executive Director, Minnesota Biofuels Association

Read the original letter here.

Ethanol Producer Magazine

Jul 15, 2024

CoBank maintained its positive outlook for U.S. ethanol production in its latest Quarterly Research Report, released July 11, with higher margins and a strong export market continuing to benefit ethanol producers. 

According to CoBank, sustained lower corn and natural gas prices have helped boost ethanol margins. Well-managed facilities will continue to take advantage of the higher margin environment in the months ahead, the report predicts. 

The recent narrowing of the ethanol price discount to gasoline could affect price-sensitive markets, CoBank said in the report, but noted that the summer driving season does help offset some price challenges.

While domestic ethanol demand has tracked lower in tandem with decreased gasoline demand in recent months, export demand has been strong. Within the report, CoBank cites the USDA’s May forecast that 2024 fuel ethanol exports could reach $4 billion this year, matching the fiscal year 2022 record.

CoBank’s report also addresses the outlook for corn, explaining that the USDA shocked the market at the end of June with higher-than-expected totals on corn acreage and stocks. Planted corn acreage is up nearly 2% when compared to data gathered as part of the USDA’s March Prospective Plantings survey. Corn stocks were also well above expectations. CoBank said the larger planted acreage and higher stocks should provide some cushion against potential production losses from widespread floods that occurred across Iowa, Minnesota and South Dakota in June. In addition to flooding, the U.S. corn crop also risks yield losses form expected extreme heat this summer. 

A full copy of the report is available on the CoBank website.

Read the original story here.

Renewable Fuels Association

Jul 9, 2024

A  new study  by economists at UC Berkeley and the U.S. Naval Academy found California drivers could expect to save 20 cents per gallon if the state allowed gas stations to sell E15 fuel – a blend of 15 percent ethanol and 85 percent gasoline approved in all 49 other states.

The potential savings for California consumers could reach $2.7 billion annually, according to the study authored by David Zilberman, PhD, a distinguished professor in the Agricultural and Resources Economics Department at UC Berkeley, and Scott Kaplan, PhD, assistant professor in the Economics Department at the United States Naval Academy.

“Consumers have the potential to gain significantly from the introduction and purchase of E15,” according to the study. “In particular, our estimates suggest an approximately 20 cents per gallon discount for E15 compared with E10 after adjusting for energy content.” The authors also highlighted the benefit of E15’s lower carbon emissions. “In California, price savings for lower GHG intensity fuels are larger, likely due to California-specific policies incentivizing low carbon fuels.”

California is the last remaining state to limit ethanol inclusion in gasoline to just 10 percent (E10), but state regulators are considering approval of E15 after extensive vehicle testing showed the fuel offers important emissions benefits. E15 is legally approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for use in all cars, pickups, SUVs and vans manufactured in the last 24 years.

The study,  sponsored by the Renewable Fuels Association, details the economic viability and implications of adopting E15 in California by analyzing fuel characteristics, market dynamics, and regulatory influences. Beyond direct cost savings, researchers found that increased use of ethanol-blend biofuels lowers gasoline usage, enhances energy security and reduces greenhouse gas emissions.

“Based on this study’s results, a typical California household could save $200 per year on their gas bill if state regulators would simply allow drivers to fuel up on E15,” said RFA President and CEO Geoff Cooper, noting that more than 24 million registered vehicles in California are already approved to use E15, but stations are not allowed to sell it. “It’s time for California to catch up to the other 49 states that already allow consumers to choose lower-cost, lower-carbon E15. The state’s failure to approve the use of E15 essentially amounts to a gas price hike at a time when hardworking Californians can least afford it.”

The study also found that “low-income commuters may stand to gain the most from a transition towards E15,” given their propensity to have longer commutes and less fuel-efficient vehicles.

An earlier study commissioned by the California Air Resources Board  found that adopting E15 in California could also provide significant environmental benefits, cutting emissions of tailpipe pollutants—like particulate matter and carbon monoxide—that cause air quality and human health problems.

Read the original press release here.

Renewable Fuels Association

Jul 3, 2024

U.S. ethanol exports reached the highest level ever for the month of May at 154.4 million gallons (mg), though this represented a 28% decline from a near-record in April. In a shift from recent trends, shippers targeted just twelve markets. Canada was the largest importer for the 38th consecutive month, despite a 4% decrease to 59.7 mg. The Philippines imported the largest monthly volume since October 2018 with an 82% jump to 16.0 mg. Exports also expanded to the European Union (14.2 mg, +3%), South Korea (13.0 mg, +8% to a 15-month high) and Singapore (9.1 mg, +452%). The remaining fifth of U.S. ethanol exports landed in the United Kingdom, Colombia, Brazil (for the second consecutive month), Mexico, Vietnam, Peru, and Jamaica. Year-to-date U.S. ethanol exports totaled 816.9 mg, up 43% from the same period last year.

The U.S. did not log any meaningful imports of foreign ethanol in May (141,806 gallons of undenatured fuel ethanol shipped from Brazil and Canada). Year-to-date imports stand at 1.4 mg.

U.S. exports of dried distillers grains (DDGS), the animal feed co-product generated by dry-mill ethanol plants, climbed 4% to 1.01 million metric tons (mt) on mixed markets. Shipments to Mexico declined by 15% to 198,438 mt, yet volumes were sufficiently strong to remain our top DDGS customer for the fifth straight month. Exports also decreased to South Korea (114,029 mt, -8%), Indonesia (84,884 mt, -33%), Vietnam (78,183 mt, -22%), Canada (55,799 mt, -8%), and Turkey (35,807 mt, -0.3%). Offsetting these reductions was a sizeable export expansion to the European Union (108,420 mt, +128% to a 28-month high), Colombia (40,035 mt, +89%), and China (39,962 mt, +99% to a 28-month high). The remaining quarter of U.S. DDGS shipments were spread across 30 countries. Year-to-date DDGS exports reached 4.93 million mt, up 18% compared to the previous year.

Read the original story here

Renewable Fuels Association

Jun 27, 2024

By Geoff Cooper, RFA President and CEO

In early 2022, University of Wisconsin researcher Tyler Lark published a  study  claiming that U.S. farmers had converted several million acres of pristine grassland and other “seminatural areas” to cropland in response to the Renewable Fuel Standard and growth in ethanol production.

The study was accompanied by a well-funded, well-orchestrated public relations blitz that resulted in dozens of news articles and editorials, widespread radio and TV coverage, and echo-chambering on blogs and social media channels. Even though the study’s methods and findings were  roundly criticized  and  swiftly rebuked  by the scientific community, the massive PR push behind the study unfortunately succeeded in spreading the “land use change” myth far and wide.

Two years later (March 2024), Lark published another  study  on land use change. Only this time there was no big publicity campaign. No interviews on NPR, no pithy feature story on Fox News or HBO talk shows, no social media blasts, no TIME magazine pieces, no National Wildlife Federation press conferences, no congressional staff briefings (those are all things that really happened after the 2022 study). In fact, the newest Lark study made about as much noise as a tree falling in the woods.

Why? What changed? How come there wasn’t a massive PR effort around the new land use study?

Put simply: the results of the new Lark paper don’t fit the doomsday narrative that was carefully crafted by media-savvy PR firms following the release of 2022 study. Indeed, the new Lark study actually contradicts and undermines his study that made headlines two years ago. That’s why they’re keeping it quiet.

Using the same satellite imagery approach that Lark used for the 2022 study, this newest study shows that between 1986 and 2018—a timeframe that encompasses the period of rapid growth in ethanol production—more than 30 million acres of U.S. cropland were abandoned and transitioned into grassland/permanent pasture, forest, shrubland, wetlands, urban areas, and other uses.

Wow! That’s right…rather than claiming cropland expanded into grassland and forest areas during the biofuels era (like his previous papers), this new Lark study suggests the exact opposite occurred.

According to the new analysis, U.S. cropland area significantly receded over the 33-year period examined—and in its place, grassland, permanent pasture, trees, and shrubs sprang up. Some of the ground was enrolled in CRP, but most was not. Lark and his colleagues concluded that “among the abandoned croplands, 53% changed to grassland and pasture, 18.6% to shrubland and forest, 8.4% to wetlands, and 4.6% to non-vegetated lands” (it seems likely that “non-vegetated land” is mostly urban/suburban land).

These findings appear generally consistent with land use data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and EPA, which show steadily declining cropland area and stable or increasing forest and grassland over the past several decades.

To put 30 million acres of abandoned cropland into context, consider that roughly 27 million acres of cropland were used to produce 15.6 billion gallons of ethanol and nearly 40 million tons of distillers grains animal feed last year. So, according to Tyler Lark, we’ve lost more cropland in the past three decades than we actually use today for ethanol and its many co-products. It’s also noteworthy that the 2022 Lark study’s highly flawed estimate of land use change (i.e., so-called “natural lands” converted to cropland) caused by the RFS was 4.4 million acres—seven times smaller than Lark’s new estimate of the amount of cropland that transitioned to grassland, pasture, forest, shrubland and other non-crop uses.

So, where did the abandonment of cropland and growth in grassland, forest, shrubland, and wetlands primarily occur? According to the new Lark study, areas with the highest amount of conversion from cropland to non-cropland were the Dakotas, Kansas, Montana, Oklahoma, and Texas. Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan also had large amounts of abandoned cropland that transitioned into grassland, forest, and other land types.

Ironically, these are many of the same states where previous Lark studies claimed significant cropland expansion into native lands was occurring—especially the Dakotas, Minnesota, southern Iowa, and northern Missouri. The new study suggests some counties in those same states saw as much as 20-30% of total cropland abandoned and transitioned into other land types between 1986 and 2018.

Moreover: “The cropland abandonment we identify here is expected to persist,” the authors wrote.

They also found that “urban development is another important cause of cropland loss,” and specifically noted Chicago, Milwaukee, Indianapolis, Minneapolis, Detroit, St. Louis and Columbus as cities where urban sprawl has displaced productive cropland.

Now, before you go thinking this group of researchers has finally seen the light, it’s important to note that this new study suffers from many of the same methodological problems and flaws as their previous satellite imagery work (e.g., lumping pasture and grass hay ground together with native grassland; misclassification of certain land cover types in the “Cropland Data Layer” tool).

Nonetheless, it’s intriguing to see Lark and his colleagues arriving at conclusions that so clearly undercut and further discredit their previous land use change studies.

Hopefully, the PR machine that ginned up all the publicity on the 2022 Lark study has a new seven-figure campaign in the works to publicize these results on the substantial amount of cropland abandonment and the remarkable increases in efficiency experienced throughout U.S. agriculture. Will the environmental groups aligned with Lark ask their PR firms to pitch this story to reporters? Will Lark go back on public radio to correct the record? Will Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld or HBO’s John Oliver pick up the story and do a mea culpa after being misled by Lark’s previous work?

We’re not holding our breath.

Read the original story here