In the News

Ames Tribune

April 12, 2019

By

In order to battle the tough Friday afternoon winds, presidential candidate and Minnesota senator Amy Klobuchar donned a lime-green hard hat and thick pea coat as she toured the Lincolnway Energy Plant in Nevada.

But for the presidential hopeful, battling the wind isn’t the issue, it’s battling major oil companies and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) small-refinery waivers on behalf of ethanol companies.

The waivers grant a small refinery temporary exemption from its annual Renewable Volume Obligations, which determine how many gallons of biofuel refineries will add to the motor fuel mix.

Following her tour of the ethanol plant, Klobuchar held a roundtable discussion with local ethanol plant producers and ethanol experts to hear the concerns and challenges the ethanol industry is facing.

Ethanol producers stated that small-refinery waivers issued by the EPA are “taking three billion gallons of demand or 20 percent of demand from the ethanol industry.”

“I think part of (this discussion) is taking on the oil companies and blatantly talking about it,” Klobuchar said. “Yeah, they have their market, but (ethanol) has their market, too, and they are trying to stomp on us and we need to speak out or we don’t have a chance.”

In terms of policy, Klobuchar said, “replacing the gallons lost” in the industry is important, as well as promoting cellulosic ethanol, ethanol produced from the fiber of a plant as a means to help recoup losses suffered in the past years.

Klobuchar also vouched for protecting and addressing how the waivers affect the Renewable Identification Numbers (RIN) market and the year-round sale of gasoline with up to 15 percent ethanol, also known as E15.

RIN is a serial number assigned to a batch of biofuel that act as credits of compliance or a type of currency of the Renewable Fuel Standard Program.

One of the concerns expressed Friday was that that small refinery exemptions issued by former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt eroded demand for ethanol in 2018 and created the RIN market for ethanol.

?(One of the things we can do) is the RIN market, and making sure it’s functioning and addressing whatever the problems are,” Klobuchar said. “We know that people are going to mess around with it, and those waivers mess around with it, too.”

In 2018, President Trump directed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to consider reforming the RIN market, and to allow the year-round sale of E15.

However, many at the roundtable said that the EPA small refinery waivers and exemptions have been overused, threatening demand for corn-based ethanol at a time when farmers are already struggling.

“We don’t make a fraction of a cent on RINs,” said Blair Picard, Commercial Manager of Lincolnway Energy. “Our RINs go out the door free with our ethanol,so you could say on one hand, we’re not as concerned with the price of RINs as we are with the price of ethanol and our margin, which both have deteriorated as a direct example of these small refinery exemptions.”

Klobuchar blended the concerns of ethanol producers with the “immediate need” to address climate change and environmental issues.

The senator said she would address climate change on day one by entering the United States back into the international climate change agreement, bringing back the clean power standards adopted under the Obama Administration, and re-implementing gas mileage standards.

“I’m a strong believer that we have to do something about climate change on day one,” Klobuchar said following the roundtable discussion. “Those are rules so they are easier to put (out for a vote), and you may have comment periods, but you can get those done in the first year.”

Klobuchar also shared her visions to get to universal health care through a public health insurance option.

Read the original article: Klobuchar Talks Ethanol Challenges at Nevada Plant

Reuters

April 12, 2019

By Humeyra Pamuk

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Friday took the first step to revive part of a rule that could, if finalized, reveal the names of oil refineries which applied for exemptions from the nation’s biofuel laws.

The move is seen as a win for the corn industry, which has criticized the waiver program due to its lack of transparency. The EPA only in 2017 first began releasing the number of waiver petitions it has received and granted but the names have been kept confidential so far.

Under the federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program, refiners are required to blend biofuels into the nation’s gasoline pool, but small operations can apply for exemptions. The Trump administration made extensive use of such waivers in the last two years, saving refiners money but angering the corn lobby, particularly after major companies like Exxon Mobil Corp received exemptions for certain facilities.

The issue is a battlefield between the rival oil and corn industries. The ethanol industry claims the exemptions have been overused, threatening demand for corn-based ethanol at a time when farmers are already struggling.

The oil companies have long complained that speculation in the biofuels credit market has inflated prices and complying with cost them hundreds of millions of dollars - one of a long list of complaints by the industry about U.S. biofuel policy.

On Friday, the EPA signed a Federal Register notice saying it is reopening the comment period for a provision in a rule related to the small refinery exemption program that was first introduced in 2016.

That provision from 2016 proposed to establish a determination that basic information related to EPA actions on petitions for RFS small refinery and small refiner exemptions may not be claimed as confidential business information, according to a document on the provision on EPA’s website.

“With respect to each decision on a small refinery/refiner exemption request, we would release to the public the petitioner’s name, the name and location of the facility for which relief was requested, the general nature of the relief requested, the time period for which relief was requested, and the extent to which EPA granted or denied the requested relief,” the document said.

While ethanol groups mostly hailed the move, oil industry representatives were largely critical. Fuelling American Jobs Coalition said the proposal, if finalized, would do more harm than good.

“The data underlying Small Refinery Exemption requests reflects the underlying financial health of facilities in the highly competitive refining sector. Such information can affect access to capital for marginal refineries and can make them attractive targets of acquisition, literally moving markets,” it said in a statement.

To obtain a waiver, refineries with a capacity of less than 75,000 barrels per day (bpd) have to prove that compliance with RFS would cause them significant financial strain. They submit information about the company’s financial health while doing that, although the EPA’s provision does not include revealing that.

EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler, in an interview with Reuters on Thursday, hinted there could be fewer exemptions under his leadership due to the lower price of biofuel credits that have reduced economic hardship, which is one of the conditions for the exemption.

Read the original article: U.S. EPA Revives Provision That May Name Refiners Applying for Biofuel Waivers

Senator Chuck Grassley

April 11, 2019

Press Release

U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa sent a letter to Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Rick Perry asking for clarity about the department’s review process concerning Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) hardship exemptions, submitted by small refineries. The DOE provides recommendations on exemption requests to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

“EPA has granted an unprecedented number of small refinery hardship exemptions for 2016 and 2017 and even more small refineries are seeking exemptions from the RFS for 2018,” Grassley wrote. “With Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) at multi-year lows, it’s hard to comprehend the alleged disproportionate economic hardship that any refinery could face.”

Grassley is a leader in the fight to maintain a strong Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). He led efforts to put pressure on the EPA to stop issuing “hardship waivers” to obligated refiners as well as make the waiver process more transparent and highlight the importance of the RFS to President Trump and his administration.

Full letter is available here and below.

The Honorable Rick Perry

Secretary

United States Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave., SW

Washington, DC 20585

Dear Secretary Perry:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Wheeler has informed me and my colleagues in Congress recently that EPA is waiting on recommendations from the Department of Energy (DOE) regarding a record number of 39 applications submitted by small refineries seeking disproportionate economic hardship exemptions from the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) for the year 2018. EPA has granted an unprecedented number of small refinery hardship exemptions for 2016 and 2017 and even more small refineries are seeking exemptions from the RFS for 2018. With Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) at multi-year lows, it’s hard to comprehend the alleged disproportionate economic hardship that any refinery could face. I am writing to seek clarity regarding the DOE’s review of requests to exempt certain small refineries from their obligations to comply with the RFS provisions of the Clean Air Act.

As you know, Section 211(o)(9)(B)(ii) of the Clean Air Act requires the EPA to consult with DOE in evaluating the small refinery hardship exemptions. EPA makes the final decision on granting such exemptions but Administrator Wheeler also suggested that EPA simply follows the recommendations of DOE. If this is the case, I would like to understand what has changed in DOE’s approach to evaluating such requests that would explain the sudden surge in the number of exemption extensions granted to small refineries over the last two years.   

The criteria by which DOE is supposed to evaluate small refinery exemption extensions have not changed since 2011, when DOE created a scoring methodology for such requests as part of a congressionally-mandated study. DOE’s methodology requires an evaluation of the structural impacts that compliance with the RFS might cause, such as limited access to capital and credit, as well as an evaluation of how RFS compliance would significantly impair refinery operations viability. Although DOE maintains it hasn’t changed these criteria, the number of small refinery exemption applications and approvals inexplicably has soared in the last two years.

Recent litigation in the D.C. Circuit has revealed that out of 48 applications for small refinery exemptions to EPA for compliance years 2016 and 2017, DOE had given the applicant a viability score of zero in at least half of those cases. This seems to indicate that compliance costs with the RFS had little to no impact on the small refinery’s ability to stay competitive and profitable. Given EPA’s assertion that it’s granting of small refinery exemptions remains based on DOE’s analysis and recommendations, I respectfully seek the following information from DOE:

1. Has DOE changed the criteria, the interpretation of the criteria, the methodology, or any other significant aspect of how it makes its recommendations to EPA for small refinery exemptions?

2. Are you aware of any instances where DOE recommended no small refinery exemption (or only a partial exemption) but EPA granted a small refinery exemption anyway? If so, how many times has this occurred?

3. DOE’s 2011 Small Refinery Study states that DOE would make a recommendation of disproportionate impact if scoring of both indices—Disproportionate Structural Impacts Metrics and Viability Index—were greater than one. How does DOE’s recommendation for a partial exemption to a small refinery with a Viability Index of 0.0 square with the statute’s requirement that the exemption can be extended only if the refinery is subject to a “disproportionate economic hardship” from compliance with the RFS?

I look forward to your response.

Read the original press release: Grassley Questions Hardship RFS Exemption Review Process at DOE

Ethanol Producer Magazine

April 10, 2019

By Erin Voegele

The U.S. Energy Information Administration has released the April edition of its Short-Term Energy Outlook, maintaining its March forecast for 2019 and 2020 ethanol production and predicting increased ethanol blending during the upcoming summer driving season.

In the new STEO, the EIA maintains its previous prediction that ethanol production will average 1.04 million barrels per day this year, increasing to 1.05 million barrels per day next year.

On a quarterly basis, the EIA shows ethanol production averaged approximately 1.01 million barrels per day during the first three months of this year. Production is expected to increase to 1.05 million barrels per day during the second quarter, and then fall to 1.04 million barrels per day during the final half of 2019. In 2020, ethanol production is expected to average 1.04 million barrels per day during the first quarter, before increasing to 1.05 million barrels per day for the remainder of the year.

The EIA currently expects ethanol consumption to average 950,000 barrels per day in both 2019 and 2020, up from 940,000 barrels per day in 2018.

The EIA’s April STEO also addresses ethanol blending in its outlook for summer gasoline. According to the report, the EIA currently forecasts fuel ethanol blending will reach 974,000 million barrels per day during the second quarter of this year, up 3.2 percent when compared to the same quarter of last year. Ethanol blending during the third quarter is expected to reach 966,000 barrels per day, up 0.8 percent when compared to the same period of 2018.  For the full six-month period, the EIA expects ethanol blending to average 970,000 barrels per day, up 2 percent when compared to the same period of last year.

The EIA’s most recent weekly data shows ethanol production averaged 1.0.2 million barrels per day the week ending April 5, up from 999,000 barrels per day the previous week. Weekly ending stocks of ethanol fell to 23.193 million barrels the week ending April 5, down from 23.992 million barrels the previous week.

The agency’s most recent monthly data shows the U.S. imported 255,000 barrels of ethanol in December, all from Brazil. The EIA’s most recent export data shows the U.S. exported 3.048 million barrels of ethanol in January, primarily to Brazil, Canada, and India.

Read the original article: EIA Predicts Increased Ethanol Blending This Summer

Ethanol Producer Magazine

April 8, 2019

By the Renewable Fuels Association

A new study published in the academic journal Biomass and Bioenergy exposes the fatal methodological flaws and erroneous conclusions regarding biofuels and land use change (LUC) found in recent studies paid for by the National Wildlife Federation (NWF). In addition, the new analysis found that U.S. biofuels expansion has not caused a detectable increase in the U.S. food prices.

“The real-world data showed no evidence of food price increases or other lands converting to agriculture because of biofuel,” according to the study, which was conducted by scientists at the University of Idaho and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The research was funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture and USDA Office of the Chief Economist.

The new analysis found that the type of satellite data relied upon by NWF is error-prone, unreliable, and “misleading.” According to the report, “The automated [satellite] land use classification errors were biased towards classifying ambiguous land as agriculture.”

Specifically, the authors manually inspected actual land uses to see if the satellite imagery used by NWF correctly classified the land use. The researchers found that 10.9% of actual non-agricultural land was misclassified as agricultural land by the satellite data. Further, while automated classification using the satellite data showed an 8.53% increase in agricultural land from 2011-2015, the manual classification indicated no significant land use change at all.

“The use of satellite data is prone to error in classifying certain land uses, such as distinguishing between cropland used to grow hay, and pasture land for grazing…Although an automated satellite image classification provides a convenient way to quantify land use change, the results could be misleading if not carefully verified,” the authors explained.

As an example of the problems associated with relying on satellite data for land use change analysis, the paper includes a captivating image showing how satellite tools mistakenly characterized large tracts of urban housing in Lemoore, Calif., as “cropland.”

 “This latest analysis joins a growing body of real-world evidence showing that cropland area has continued to shrink and food prices have continued to trend lower since the Renewable Fuel Standard was adopted,” said RFA President and CEO Geoff Cooper. “Recent studies from University of Illinois, USDA, Iowa State University, Purdue University, the Department of Energy, and others have all found that initial predictions of biofuel-related land use change were grossly overstated. Actual empirical evidence shows that farmers have responded to increased demand by using existing cropland more efficiently.”

A copy of the analysis is available here.

Read the original article: RFA: New Study Exposes Absurdity of NWF Land Use Change Claims

Ethanol Producer Magazine

April 1, 2019

By Erin Voegele

Data released by the UDSA’s Foreign Agricultural Service on March 27 shows the U.S. exported 127.91 million gallons of ethanol and 806,615 tons of distillers grains during the first month of 2019.

January ethanol exports of 127.91 million gallons were up significantly when compared to exports of 88.31 million gallons reported for the same month of 2018. Top destinations for U.S. ethanol during the first month of the year include Brazil at 38.49 million gallons, India at nearly 20 million gallons, and Canada at 19.97 million gallons.

January distillers grains exports of 806,615 tons were down when compared to the 898,940 tons expected during the same period of last year. Top destinations included Mexico at 199,312 tons, Indonesia at 90.29 tons, South Korea at 89,364 tons, and Vietnam at 89,356 tons.

Additional data is available on the USDA FAS website.

Read the original story here: USDA : Ethanol Exports Reach 127.9 Million Gallons In January

Energy AgWired

March 28, 2019

By Cindy Zimmerman

Ypsilanti, Michigan will be the place Friday morning for advocates and opponents of EPA’s proposed regulatory changes related to retail sales of 15% ethanol blended fuel (E15) and the renewable identification number (RIN) compliance system Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program.

The Environmental Protection Agency is holding a hearing on the proposal released just 16 days ago that would allow E15 to take advantage of the 1-psi Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) waiver that currently applies to E10 during the summer months, and to change the RIN program to bring greater transparency to the market and deter price manipulation.

The hearing will start at 9:00 am Eastern on Friday, March 29 and will end when all parties present who wish to speak have had a chance to do so. Location is the Ann Arbor Marriott Ypsilanti at Eagle Crest.

EPA has set up a listen-in line for those unable to be at the hearing. The number is 866-667-1852, Conference Code 7695837.

Read the original article: EPA Hearing on E15 in Michigan Tomorrow

Maersk

March 22, 2019

Press Release

Convinced of the urgency to act on climate, a group of Dutch multinationals - FrieslandCampina, Heineken, Philips, DSM, Shell and Unilever - all members of the Dutch Sustainable Growth Coalition (DSGC), will join forces with A.P. Moller - Maersk to take a tangible step towards the decarbonization of ocean shipping.

A pilot, using up to 20% sustainable second-generation biofuels on a large triple-E ocean vessel will sail 25.000 nautical miles from Rotterdam to Shanghai and back on biofuel blends alone, a world’s first at this scale, saving 1,5 million kilograms CO2 and 20.000 kilograms of sulphur.

DSGC members and Maersk all agree that tackling harmful emissions related to shipping is urgently needed, and that cross-industry collaboration is required to develop, test and implement new solutions. The DSGC members, many of which are customers to Maersk, played a critical role. They initiated and sponsor the pilot. Shell, acted as the fuel supplier for the pilot, and Maersk played the role as operating partner. 

Sustainably sourced second-generation biofuels are just one possible solution for the decarbonization of ocean shipping. Longer term, breakthroughs in fuel and technical development (i.e. e-fuels) and the investment into commercial supply chains are needed to achieve significant emissions reductions. 

“DSGC companies join in action to contribute to the UN SDGs. With this initiative we focus on Climate Action (SDG 13). We have taken the initiative to partner with A.P. Moller-Maersk on this important effort,” says Jan Peter Balkenende, Chair of the DSGC. “This pilot testing biofuel on a cross ocean shipping lane, marks an important step. However, many more innovations are urgently needed. These can only be successfully developed, tested and implemented in industry collaborations like this.”

Søren Toft, Chief Operating Officer A.P. Moller – Maersk commented: “To reach our net zero CO2 target by 2050, in the next 10 years we need big breakthroughs. Maersk cannot do this alone. That is why this collaboration with DSGC and its members is such an important step in identifying and bringing low carbon solutions to life. It laid the foundation for how cross-industry partners can work together to take steps towards a more sustainable future. We welcome others to join in our efforts, as this journey is just beginning.” 

Søren Toft added “Biofuels are one of the viable solutions that can be implemented in the short and medium term. Through this pilot, we aim to learn more about using biofuels in general, and to understand the possibilities around increasing its usage in a sustainable and economical way.” 

Shipping accounts for 90% of transported goods and 3% of total global CO2-emissions, and is set to rise to 15% by 2050 if left unchecked. The CO2 savings of this journey alone equates to the annual CO2 emitted by over 200 households in a year or 12 mill km travelled in an average car which is 300 times around the world. The voyage will take place between March and June 2019. 

About the biofuel used:

The biofuel used in this pilot is a so called ‘second generation’ biofuel, produced from waste sources, in this case used cooking oil (UCOME oil). Second generation biofuel means the biofuel comes from waste products. This can be used cooking oil, forest residues, wood chip waste etc. This biofuel is ISCC Certified, meaning that the whole chain is 3rd party certified.  The power of biofuel is that it can to a certain extent replace / blended with conventional (fossil) fuels, without having to make big technical adaptations to the engines or require a complete new engine etc. 

About Maersk

A.P. Moller - Maersk is an integrated container logistics company working to connect and simplify its customers’ supply chains. As the global leader in shipping services, we operate in 130 countries and employ roughly 76,000 people. Our mission is to enable and facilitate global supply chains and provide opportunities for our customers to trade globally.

Read the original article: Dutch Sustainable Growth Coalition Partners with Maersk in World's Largest Maritime Biofuel Pilot