×

Warning

JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 727

In the News

Just Auto

June 16, 2017

By

Nissan was the auto industry's first company to develop a vehicle prototype powered by a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) that works with bio-ethanol. By combining this and two other technologies (electric motor and a 24 kW/h battery) range is in excess of 600km (375 miles).

Brazil was chosen by the Japanese automaker for the global reveal of the technology and initial testing due to its huge, nationwide ethanol supply network and being the world's second largest ethanol producer.

Testing was done with two SOFC-equipped e-NV200 electric vans made in Spain and fitted with an ethanol fuel tank of just 30 litres (6.6 imperial gallons).

The first testing cycle in daily use was accomplished in the last few months by the Nissan Brazil research and development team. The technology fitted perfectly with day to day use and with Brazil's 5% water, hydrous ethanol fuel.

The Fuel Cell e-bio's research and development programme was announced by Nissan in Yokohama, Japan, in June 2016. It was first unveiled on the eve of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games opening in Rio de Janeiro City in August last year at an event for smart mobility organised by Nissan.

The motor is clean, highly efficient and it works 100% on straight ethanol or on a mix of ethanol with up to 50% water, which would make it easier to use in countries with no ethanol production dependent on imports. Its emission are classified as carbon-neutral well to wheel.

The Fuel Cell e-Bio provides the usual strong acceleration and silent drive of any electric vehicle, together with low maintenance costs, but with the range of a fossil fuel-powered vehicle.

Bio-ethanol comes mainly from sugar cane and corn available in North and South American countries.

Read the original article: Nissan Brazil Ends Initial Tests of Ethanol Fuel Cell

KTIC Radio

By U.S. Grains Council

June 19, 2017

The Mexican Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE) announced recently a change that will increase the maximum amount of ethanol that can be blended in Mexican gas supplies from 5.8 percent to 10 percent, except in the cities of Monterrey, Guadalajara and Mexico City.

The announcement modifies the Mexican Official Standard NOM 016-CRE-2016 regarding the quality specifications for fuels by increasing the maximum volume content of anhydrous ethanol as an oxygenate in regular and premium gasolines in Mexico.

This change comes as part of ongoing energy reforms in Mexico and follows input from stakeholders in the government, private sector, research scientists and social interest groups.

Mexico’s regulators moved in August 2016 to allow ethanol in local fuel supplies, except in its three largest metropolitan areas. In its decision, the CRE recognized the benefits of E10, which will help demonstrate that a 10 percent ethanol blend can positively contribute to air quality improvement and reduced cancer risk throughout the country. The Mexican Institute of Petroleum is also studying the merits of E10 blends.

The decision moves Mexico toward global standards in the use of renewable and sustainable energy resources like ethanol that offer environmental, economic, social and public health advantages over other additives and oxygenates for gasoline.

“We are pleased to see this decision, which is the culmination of significant work by Mexican authorities and industry as they continue to diversify and improve their fuel supplies,” said Tom Sleight, U.S. Grains Council (USGC) President and CEO. “We appreciate the opportunity to work with Mexican leaders as they seek to build their own biofuels industry and offer cleaner fuels for the Mexican people.”

“We’re strongly encouraged by this announcement, which clears the way for further adoption of ethanol into the Mexican fuel supply,” said Growth Energy CEO Emily Skor. “By doing so, Mexican consumers will see how embracing ethanol will reduce harmful emissions, help contribute to a cleaner environment, and will create a stronger rural sector.”

“We are greatly encouraged by Mexico’s recent decision to allow the sale and use of 10 percent ethanol (E10) as part of its fuel market reform efforts,” said Renewable Fuels Association President and CEO Bob Dinneen. “By permitting the use of E10 in its fuel market, Mexico will have blend levels consistent with fuel sold and used throughout the United States and Canada. Not only will Mexico be able to achieve greater octane and oxygenate benefits from using E10, it will help to drive trade and investment in its ethanol fuel sector. We hope the Mexican Institute of Petroleum will soon conclude its study, and are confident the study will affirm the air quality benefits of the use of E10 in the country’s most populous cities, thereby allowing it to be used in all regions of the country.”

Read the original story: U.S. Ethanol Organizations Applaud Mexico’s Adoption Of E10

AgriPulse

June 14, 2017

By Spencer Chase

A hearing of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee left backers of a bill that would expand sale of higher ethanol blends encouraged, but the legislation has an uncertain future.

The hearing examined the Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act (S.517), which would alter the Clean Air Act to allow for the sale of blends of ethanol like E15 to be sold in the summer. Currently, Reid vapor pressure restrictions are only waived for E10, a 10 percent blend that accounts for most of the fuel sold in the U.S.

While the hearing did examine the legislation, it wasn’t a formal markup of the bill. Sen. Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican who is one of the bill’s 17 co-sponsors, told reporters yesterday that he hoped to see a markup next week, but Committee Chairman John Barrasso told Agri-Pulse that isn’t going to happen.

“It’s not going to be next week,” the Wyoming Republican said. Asked whether the committee would pursue a markup, he said that a markup of the bill “has been promised” to Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb, the bill’s sponsor, but did not mention a timeline.

Speaking to reporters after the hearing, Delaware Democrat Tom Carper, the committee’s ranking member, said he sensed a “willingness to hold a hearing, not an eagerness to move toward a markup.”

Biofuel industry sources tell Agri-Pulse  the current estimate is for a markup sometime before the August recess. But when the bill eventually does move, it may have to overcome opposition from committee leadership.

Barrasso said at the beginning of today’s hearing that he doesn’t support the bill, but said it deserved “a full and fair hearing before this committee.” Additionally, Carper told reporters after the hearing that if his concerns about how the legislation would impact the volatility of the Renewable Identification Number (RIN) market aren’t addressed, then he “could not support the bill as it is.”

A bipartisan contingent of senators, however, threw their weight behind the bill. Besides Fisher, Republicans Mike Rounds of South Dakota, Joni Ernst of Iowa and Democrat Tammy Duckworth of Illinois all spoke favorably of the legislation.

Mike Lorenz is an executive vice president with Sheetz, a retailer that sells E15. He said that after millions of transactions from thousands of customers, “we have not had a single customer complaint or any cases of misfueling.” Todd Teske, the chairman, president, and CEO of Briggs & Stratton, reiterated his concern over misfueling, however, by pointing to damaging impacts that could come about if small engines used fuel blended with more than 10 percent ethanol.

Ethanol skeptics on the committee like Oklahoma Republican Jim Inhofe also spoke against the bill, saying it would be another victory for corn ethanol and the Renewable Fuel Standard. But Brooke Coleman, the executive director of the Advanced Biofuels Business Council, said advanced biofuels like cellulosic ethanol could also benefit from the legislation. He pointed to difficulties some cellulosic projects face in securing funding because of an uncertain demand picture, and he said the bill could shore up confidence among investors.

“This will fundamentally change that conversation,” Coleman said at the hearing. “Basically, you’ll have an ethanol industry that gets to the next level from an innovation standpoint.”

After the hearing, Coleman pointed out that opponents of  the legislation will seek to pit cellulosic and other advanced biofuels against conventional corn ethanol, but he said the industry can’t let that happen. He said the same groups of lawmakers that helped pass the RFS in the first place can also play a role in backing S.517 and companion legislation in the House.

“The coalition that built the RFS was a broad, bipartisan, middle of the country, coastal America coalition, and there’s no reason to break that down.”

Read the original story: Senate Hearing Reviews E15 Bill; Path Forward Unclear

Global News Wire

June 13, 2017

By Growth Energy

Growth Energy released a new survey showing that U.S. small engine owners are pleased with the performance of their fuel and find it easy to pick the best option, including regular unleaded blends of 10 percent ethanol (E10). Conducted by Quadrant Strategies, the random poll of 500 owners of lawnmowers, snow blowers, leaf blowers, weed whackers, and other small engines also found that nine in 10 respondents considered it important to have options at the pump that include ethanol blends.

“Consumers appreciate having clean, affordable options at the pump, and small engine owners are no exception,” said Emily Skor, CEO of Growth Energy. “Biofuel critics like to claim that competition at the pump leads to confusion, but they obviously haven’t checked with American consumers who report that choice at the pump and small engine performance go hand-in-hand. Not only is picking the right fuel easy and worry-free, nearly every single respondent was satisfied with the performance of their fuel, including those using a standard 10 percent blend.”

According to the survey, 95 percent of owners found it easy to pick the right fuel, 98 percent reported satisfaction with their fuel’s performance, and 90 percent considered it important to have options at the pump, including ethanol blends. The numbers were the same or even higher among only those respondents who reported using standard unleaded gasoline, which contains 10 percent ethanol.

“Ninety-seven percent of all fuel sold in the U.S. contains 10 percent ethanol, which is a high-performance option for all common outdoor equipment,” said Donn Larson, President and CEO of Larson Sales, Inc., one of America’s premier outdoor power equipment distributors, with a network of hundreds of dealers, covering a large part of the north central United States. “Ethanol provides a non-toxic octane boost to fuel, and owners report that picking the right blend is as simple as reading the label on every pump. It also reduces the need for freeze-preventing additives, which is great for snow blowers.

The survey also questioned small engine owners about how ethanol’s benefits impact their views of the homegrown fuel. 78 percent appreciated that ethanol replaces dangerous chemicals in gasoline like MTBE, 85 percent were pleased to learn that all major small engine manufacturers warranty their engines for 10 percent blends, and 88 percent valued that ethanol reduces America’s dependence on foreign oil. The same share, 88 percent, reacted positively to ethanol’s air quality benefits and the fact that it cuts carbon emissions by 43 percent.

Read the original release: Poll: Small Engine Owners Power Up on Ethanol Blends

Renewable Fuels Association

June 7, 2017

By Emily Druckman

More than a decade after the original renewable fuel standard (RFS) was signed into law, tremendous progress has been made toward its goals of energy security, clean air and boosting local economies, according to a new analysis by the Renewable Fuels Association, “RFS Impacts: By the Numbers.” The analysis comes as EPA is expected to soon issue its proposed 2018 renewable volume obligations (RVOs) under the RFS.

Congress adopted the RFS in 2005 and expanded it in 2007. The program requires oil companies to blend increasing volumes of renewable fuels with gasoline and diesel, culminating with 36 billion gallons in 2022.

“The data show that by any objective measure, the RFS has been a tremendous success,” according to the analysis, which looks at data on how the world has changed since adoption of the RFS. Specifically, the analysis compares key data points and indicators from 2005 and 2007 to data from 2016.

Among the highlights:

-The number of operational U.S. ethanol plants has grown from 81 in 2005 to 213 in 2016, while  ethanol production has grown from 3.9 billion gallons to 15.3 billion gallons, a nearly 300% increase;

-U.S. ethanol industry jobs grew 121 percent from 153,725 in 2005 to 339,176 in 2016, and the value of the industry’s output quadrupled from $8.1 billion to $32.8 billion;

-U.S. corn production has grown from 11.1 billion bushels in 2005 to 15.2 billion gallons in 2016, a 36 percent increase, while average yields grew from 147.9 bushels per acre to 174.6 bushels per acre;

-U.S. petroleum net import dependence has dropped from 60% in 2005 to 25% in 2016, and would have been 33% last year without ethanol;

-The number of retail gasoline stations offering flex fuels like E85 to flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs) grew 728 percent from 2005 to 2016, while the number of FFVs on the road grew 239 percent; and

-Ethanol’s role in cleaning the air has increased, with notable reductions in emissions of both greenhouse gases and criteria pollutants.

Meanwhile, the negative outcomes that opponents of the RFS suggested would occur simply have not materialized:

-Corn acres in 2016 were only 0.5 percent larger than in 2007, while total cropland was down more than 20 million acres (5 percent);

-Corn prices in 2016 were actually 19% lower than in 2007, while the corn surplus was 42% larger;

-Water use for irrigating corn trended lower, while the size of the Gulf hypoxia zone shrunk 14 percent between 2007 and 2016;

-Deforestation in the Amazon fell 58 percent between 2005 and 2016;

-Retail food price inflation was just 0.3 percent in 2016, compared to 2.4 percent in 2005 and 4 percent in 2007;

-Prices for red meat, poultry, fish, cereals and bakery items, and dairy actually experienced price deflation in 2016, compared to modest inflation in 2005 and 2007;

-U.S. milk production in 2016 was 20 percent higher than 2005, while red meat and poultry production was up 12 percent; and

-The U.N. global food price index was just 0.1 percent higher in 2016 than it was in 2007, while the number of people undernourished worldwide was down 16 percent.

“As this analysis clearly shows, the RFS has made a huge impact on consumers, providing them with greater choice at the pump, while cleaning the air and boosting local economies,” said RFA President and CEO Bob Dinneen. “With EPA expected to propose its 2018 RFS obligations in the near future, the agency needs to look no further than this document for what impact this vital program has had on our nation. We look forward to EPA continuing to implement a strong RFS to ensure future growth for our industry and the positive impact it has throughout all sectors of our economy.”

The full analysis is available here.

Read the original press release: RFS Has Been ‘Tremendous Success’ Since Adoption, According to RFA Analysis

Independent Tribune

June 5, 2017

By Erin Kidd

When Austin Dillon crossed the finish line and made his way to Victory Lane at the Coca-Cola 600, there were smiles from all of his supporters and probably from Dr. Andy Randolph, technical director of ECR Engines.

ECR Engines is a high-performance engine production, research and development company located on the Richard Childress Racing campus in Welcome, North Carolina. The company makes engines for Richard Childress Racing, for which Dillon is a driver.

“If you think of building an engine like making dinner, my role is to define an engine recipe; one that will make good power and have good durability,” Randolph said. “Then, a whole group of people make engines to that recipe. They are all hand-built. It’s like a mini-automotive company.”

Randolph has been part of five NASCAR Cup teams in his career, and recently visited the University of North Carolina at Charlotte to give a presentation on engine performance and ethanol-based biofuel E15, which has been used by NASCAR exclusively since 2011.

During his presentation, he gave some insight into why E15 biofuel is a valuable alternative for high-performance vehicles and everyday cars.

“I really just talked to them about ethanol as a fuel for automotive engines as a whole, going over advantages and disadvantages,” Randolph said. “I enjoy talking to students. They tend to come in unbiased and generate opinions based on facts. They also learn a few things and like to watch things explode.”

Randolph’s research focuses on the combustion properties of alcohol/diesel and alcohol/oil blends and has contributed to five NASCAR championships with three different teams.

He said the key to high-performance road cars is having high-octane fuel, which can be accomplished in many ways. Until about 2006, Randolph said NASCAR teams used leaded fuel.

“Lead has high octane characteristic with very bad blood toxins,” Randolph said. “In the sport, you are handling the fuel and practically drinking it every day. People didn’t want to die from lead poisoning or grow an arm out of their head.”

Eventually teams went to unleaded, but Randolph believes that ethanol is the way to go and the safest.

He told UNCC students that with ethanol, hydrogen burns very clean while gasoline produces more carbon emissions when burned.

“Ethanol burns with a very transparent, blue flame. The ethanol molecule has oxygen in it. To have combustion you need fuel and oxygen. Gasoline doesn’t have any oxygen itself. When you don’t have the perfect ratio of gasoline to air, the flame will get yellow or black,” Randolph said. "With ethanol, there is oxygen in the fuel; therefore the carbon doesn’t have to only get its oxygen out of the air. That allows it to burn much cleaner.”

Randolph also said that ethanol is the least expensive octane booster. And people that choose to fuel their personal vehicles with it, will end up spending less at the pump.

"The first thing skeptics point to is that you tend to have a very small decrease in fuel mileage. The reason is because it takes more volume of fuel to make a given amount of energy,” Randolph said. “The counter argument to that is it’s considerably cheaper. I tend to worry about how much it costs me to drive. I worry more about miles per dollar than miles per gallon.”

E15 is available in 29 states, including North Carolina.

Read the original story: E15 Biofuel in NASCAR and Spreading Across the Country

Phys.Org

June 7, 2017

Making a living raising cattle isn't as simple as just buying a herd and turning it out to pasture. Cattle require specific diets to maintain proper nutrition and weight gain. And how to do this in the most effective and efficient way possible has interested both ranchers and researchers for generations.

Scientists in Texas are interested in how seasons affect how well cattle can digest a type of Bermuda grass, Tifton 85. In a recent study, they found that as seasons progress, the grass becomes harder to digest. However, by supplementing with the dried distillers' grains, this effect can be minimized.

Dried distillers' grains are left over after ethanol production. They are what remains of the ground corn used for fermentation.

"Due to the ramp-up in ethanol production over the past few decades, there has been an abundance of this byproduct in the beef industry," explains Monte Rouquette, a professor with Texas A&M AgriLife Research. "Originally viewed as a waste product of the industry, research began looking into other uses of the byproduct."

He adds that using it as food for livestock is an efficient use of this product. The value-added aspect has moved the grains from wasted to wanted.

The dried grains are now commonly used as a relatively cheap source of feed. In some instances, it can replace primary feed ingredients like corn or soybeans. Some supplements provide additional energy, some more protein, and others minerals. The distillers' grain is used for both protein and energy.

How does this fit with the forage season? Tifton 85 Bermuda grass is a common forage grass across the south and southeast United States. However, as the plants mature, they become harder for livestock to digest. The cattle have a harder time extracting nutrients from the grass. The grains can help add back those nutrients.

The results of this study, conducted by W. Brandon Smith as part of his PhD research, point to a potential two-season grazing strategy, based on animal size, weight, and age. For example, lightweight animals could graze in the early summer without the grain supplement because the grass is able to give them the needed nutrients to thrive.

In the later part of the summer, the matured animals could graze with the distillers' grain supplement. The grain would add back some of the nutrients the cattle lose out on when the grass is further into season.

This research allows the scientists to determine the most effective and efficient way to use distillers' grains as a supplement. They can learn how much is best to give, when is best to give it, and how much return it can provide a rancher.

"These data can then be used in an economic assessment to provide a baseline of potential responses from the use of a supplement," says Rouquette. "This work is of interest to us me because it sheds light on changes that occur chemically within the plant across the year that affect its digestibility."

Read the original story: Waste Not, Want Not: Byproduct of Ethanol Industry Makes Suitable Cattle Feed Supplement

Reuters

June 6, 2017

By Valerie Volcovici

Five Democratic senators asked the Environmental Protection Agency in a letter on Tuesday to hand over documents relating to the role of Carl Icahn, a refining company owner, in shaping biofuels policy at the agency.

Lawmakers have for months raised concerns that Icahn's dual role as a high-powered investor and an adviser to President Donald Trump on regulation could lead to conflicts of interest. Icahn, a billionaire, owns the oil refining company CVR Energy , which is heavily impacted by U.S. policies requiring refiners to blend biofuels into their gasoline and diesel.

The senators - Sheldon Whitehouse, Elizabeth Warren, Debbie Stabenow, Jeff Merkley and Tammy Duckworth - addressed the letter to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, requesting that he hand over communications between the EPA and Icahn or representatives of CVR Energy.

They also requested reports, data and briefings exchanged between the agency and Icahn.

"Statements made by him or actions taken by his companies may now be seen as signaling changes in EPA or administration policy which may, in turn, affect the price of CVR stock and the RIN market," the senators wrote in a letter sent to Pruitt on Tuesday.

A RIN, or Renewable Identification Number, is the name given to biofuels blending credits that many refiners are required to purchase under the U.S. biofuels regulation.

In February, Icahn, who is an unpaid adviser to Trump, submitted a proposal to the White House to change the U.S. biofuels program, the Renewable Fuel Standard, in a way that would ease the burden on oil refining companies, including his own.

A Reuters review of corporate filings in April showed that Icahn's company had also taken a large short position on biofuels credits - a bet that prices for biofuels credits would fall - that would have yielded big profits if the White House adopted the proposal.

White House officials have said the EPA is now considering Icahn's proposed overhaul to the biofuels program.

The senators gave Pruitt until June 16 to provide the information. The letter comes after the senators twice asked the White House and Icahn for information about his biofuels dealings but received no response.

Those senators last month sent a letter to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, urging that it probe Icahn's activity in the market. The CFTC on Monday informed them and four other senators that it will not investigate the credits because RINS are not traded on futures markets.

Read the original story: U.S. Senators Press EPA for Documents on Icahn's Biofuel Dealings