In the News

×

Warning

JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 727

Subscribe to this RSS feed

In the News

Global Biofuels and Biotech Industries Unite in Call for Stronger Biofuels Policies to Help in Fight Against Climate Change

Global Renewable Fuel Alliance

December 4, 2015

Press Release

Today, global transport emission have increased to 14% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions and about a quarter of the total energy-related CO2 emissions. With the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicting that transport emissions could double by 2050, the need for preventative policy measures by world leaders is clear and urgent. According to the IPCC, transport’s growing emissions could be cut by 15-40% through “aggressive and sustained” policy measures, including reducing carbon intensity of fuels by substituting oil-based products with biofuels.

According to the International Energy Agency, by 2050, biofuels could provide 27% of the world’s total transport fuel and avoid around 2.1 gigatonnes of CO2 emissions per year, with biofuels eventually providing 23% of total emissions reductions in the transport sector. Sustainable biofuels, such as ethanol, can be used in existing vehicle fleet to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40-90% compared to fossil fuels and must be considered an important part of the toolkit to decarbonize transport.

Policies mandating the use of biofuels are now in place in around 64 countries worldwide and, in their Intended National Determined Contributions (INDC) plans, 36 countries that are attending December’s climate talks in Paris have highlighted biofuels use as a key component of their national climate action policies.

Biofuels are a key driver of clean technology innovation and a key part of the global agricultural complex, helping to reduce emissions, facilitating rural development and supporting food production, particularly in poorer regions. Further deployment of biofuels could help drive investment in low carbon technology and in agriculture, increase productivity, create new employment in rural areas, reduce our global reliance on crude oil and provide a stepping stone towards a genuine bio economy.

Representing over 330 biofuels and industrial biotechnology companies that are responsible for 90% of the world’s biofuels production, we reiterate our commitment to producing biofuels sustainably and call on the parties to the UNFCCC to acknowledge the benefits of sustainable biofuels and their contribution towards climate change mitigation and the reduction of greenhouse gas from transport.

We call on world leaders to support a global target for replacing at least 15% of the world’s total oil use in transport with sustainable biofuels by 2030, with a significant presence of advanced biofuels.

See original press release: Global Biofuels and Biotech Industries Unite in Call for Stronger Biofuels Policies to Help in Fight Against Climate Change

How Will RFS Decision Affect the Biofuel Industry?

December 7, 2015

By Janet Kubat Willette

The EPA's Renewable Fuel Standard decision is either a step forward or backward, depending on your point of view.

The Environmental Protection Agency announced Nov. 30 it is setting the total renewable fuel volume at 18 billion gallons for 2016, up from the proposal of 17.4 billion made earlier this year, but down from the 22.25 billion gallons in statue.

Timothy Rudnicki, Minnesota Bio-Fuels Association executive director, said his crystal ball is foggy on the effect of the decision on the biofuels industry.

"But to me it sends the wrong signal," he said. "It sends a negative message, and that is you can't count on the law upon which to build the infrastructure or the production capacity because it will be ... it can be lowered to accommodate the petroleum interest."

The American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers issued a statement saying the decision is "an attempt by EPA to placate the biofuels lobby."

The Renewable Fuel Standard began in 2006 after being enacted through the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The RFS requirements were modified through the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.

Ethanol production in the United States has jumped from 6.5 billion gallons in 2007 to 14.3 billion gallons in 2014 and biodiesel production has grown from 0.5 billion gallons to 1.46 billion gallons during the same time period, according to the Energy Information Administration.

In their executive summary, the EPA said "while some stakeholders commented that reductions from the statutory targets would lead to a stagnation in growth, we disagree with this view.

"We proposed a 2016 volume requirement for total renewable fuel that was 1.1 billion gallons greater than the proposed 2015 volume requirement — a significant level of growth in one year," the summary reads.

Rudnicki said it's interesting the EPA, in their executive summary, writes "renewable fuels represent an opportunity for the U.S. to move away from fossil fuels towards a set of lower GHG transportation fuels and a chance for a still-developing low GHG technology sector to grow."

The RFS has been about energy security and reducing greenhouse gas emissions since its inception, Rudnicki said. It's good for the country, consumers, the environment and the economy. A study recently found 18,600-plus jobs in Minnesota are supported by the biofuels industry.

"If the petroleum industry just accepted the RFS — we know the production capacity is there — we could be exceeding where we're at today in terms of greenhouse gas reduction," he said.

The way the RFS stands now, it's hard to plan as the targets keep changing.

"For the EPA to have tinkered with the RFS and the renewable volume obligations was a big mistake," Rudnicki said. "It's like a slippery slope. Will it be changed next year? Will they find some reason to change the rule they've already set?"

The American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers hope for change.

"Today's rule is further proof that the RFS program is irreparably broken and that the only solution is for Congress to repeal it outright," AFPM president Chet Thompson said in a statement.

Read the original story: How Will RFS Decision Affect the Biofuel Industry?

Construction Begins On Renewable Chemicals Facility In Little Falls

Twin Cities Business Magazine

December 2, 2015

By Sam Schaust

Renewable chemicals company Green Biologics announced the start of construction on its 100 percent renewable chemicals manufacturing facility in Little Falls.

The site, which is being repurposed from a 21 million gallon per year ethanol plant, is said to be the first modern commercial plant in the U.S. to produce bio-based n-butanol and acetone—components used in paints, coatings, cleaning supplies and cosmetics.

Gahanna, Ohio-based Green Biologics purchased the site from The Central MN Ethanol Cooperative in December 2014. Green Biologics said it would spend a total of $76 million between the acquisition and updating of the Little Falls facility.

The company is scheduled to begin commercial production in 2016.

Read the original story: Construction Begins On Renewable Chemical Facility in Little Falls

Work to Keep Renewable Fuel Standards High

December 3, 2015

Staff Editorial

Kudos to the Environmental Protection Agency and Obama administration for increasing preliminary Renewable Fuel Standards, but the new standard still misses the mark.

Renewable Fuel Standards — how much biofuel will be produced and blended with traditional gasoline — were initially set by Congress in 2005 and expanded and updated as part of the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act. The 2007 requirements called for a total of 22.25 billion gallons of biofuels to be produced and distributed in 2016. Targets recently released by the EPA reduced that output to 18.11 billion gallons.

Congress had called for corn-based ethanol to make up 15 billion gallons of the total biofuel output in 2016. Yet the newly announced EPA requirements limit corn-based ethanol to only 14.5 billion gallons. The lower standard is bad for Iowa and for the environment.

Iowa’s cornfields provide one third of the nation’s ethanol. An estimated 47,000 of Iowa’s jobs are in the ethanol industry. Yet, economic self-preservation is only part of the reason we support biofuels, and the higher RFS standard.

In the 10 years that the RFS has been in existence, oil imports have been cut by one third — the equivalent of taking 8.4 million cars from the road. That is no small feat. Lessening our dependence on foreign oil moves the nation forward in the way Congress intended, and in a way we all can agree is needed.

No one would argue that corn-based ethanol is the perfect, permanent solution to energy independence, but the creation of a stable market for renewable fuels, including ethanol, is a critical bridge to the increasingly clean, sustainable energy solutions of the future.

The research and innovation happening now is due in large part to the government mandates that have been a part of the RFS. Guaranteed demand for biofuels calms the marketplace, enables necessary infrastructure and encourages investment and expansion.

The delays, uncertainty and target fluctuations that have plagued EPA’s oversight hinder this forward progress.

Farmers in Iowa and other grain-producing states, as well as investors in renewable energy, need clear and consistent standards.

We encourage federal lawmakers to push for the biofuel benchmarks they created. If the EPA is unwilling to keep on course, Congress needs to regain control of the wheel.

Read the original story: Work to Keep Renewable Fuel Standards High

Misleading About Ethanol

The Barre Montpelier Times Argus

December 1, 2015

By Brooke Coleman

In “Ethanol is a bad deal for Vt.” (online Nov. 21), a group called the American Council for Capital Formation argues that ethanol is a bad deal for Vermonters economically and environmentally.

The allegations sound compelling, but Vermonters need to understand that these arguments are coming from oil-funded groups and lack basis in fact.

There is no better example than this one. The American Council for Capital Formation is funded by Exxon Mobil and Halliburton, among others. It is no coincidence that it spends much of its time smearing ethanol, the oil industry’s biggest competitor and political nemesis.

You have to give the group credit for trying to make absurd arguments look good. It argues that using ethanol transfers wealth to the American Midwest, where most ethanol is made. But Midwest ethanol is an alternative to Middle Eastern oil. So Vermont, the choice is yours.

The group attacks ethanol environmentally based on “independent” analysis. But the “University of Tennessee” study mentioned was funded by the ACCF. Oil companies also sponsored the “Princeton University” work they mention, and the negative ethanol polling.

Meanwhile, actual independent analysis from the Environmental Protection Agency, the California Air Resources Board and the Department of Energy confirms that using more ethanol and other biofuels reduces climate change emissions without significant land use impacts. The idea that ethanol increases gas prices is also preposterous, as the fuel has been up to $1 cheaper than gasoline per gallon for years.

The oil industry is smart. It invents creative arguments, pays for rigged research and pushes bad polling, then finds front groups to deliver it to unsuspecting Americans too busy to verify. Decide for yourself on ethanol. But check your sources, because these oil groups do not have Vermont interests at heart.

Read the original story: Misleading About Ethanol

COP 21 Important Opportunity for World Leaders to Support Biofuels

Global Renewable Fuels Alliance

December 2, 2015

Press Release

Today, Bliss Baker, the President of the Global Renewable Fuels Alliance (GRFA), called upon world leaders participating in the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 21) in Paris to signal their support for biofuels as one of the tools to fight climate change.

“This conference is a real opportunity for world leaders to recognize the role that renewable fuels have played, and will continue to play, in the transition to a low-carbon global economy,” Baker said. “The climate problem is accelerating and biofuels represent one of the most cost-effective solutions to reduce oil use and greenhouse gas emissions from transport in the short and medium term,” he added.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has said that October 2015 was the hottest October on record by a third of a degree making it the most above-normal month since records began being kept in 1880. This was the eighth month this year when a heat record was set, representing a record number of broken records in any year.

So far, 36 countries have already recognized the opportunity presented by biofuels in reducing GHG emissions and combating climate change, and have included them in their Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) plans. Studies have shown that most biofuels, like ethanol, are proven to reduce harmful GHGs from 40% to 90% compared to fossil fuels around the world.

“Given the significant contribution biofuel is making in reducing global GHG emissions today, we believe COP 21 participants should call for an increase in biofuel use through the introduction of supportive policies, particularly for advanced biofuels,” concluded Baker.

Read the original release: COP 21 Important Opportunity for World Leaders to Support Biofuels as One of the Solutions to Mitigate Climate Change

Renewable Fuel Associations Express Mixed Reactions To Final Rule

Ethanol Prdoucer Magazine

November 30, 2015

By Sue Retka-Schill and Holly Jessen

Positive aspects were found in the U.S. EPA’s final rule establishing the renewable volume obligations (RVO) for compliance with the renewable fuel standard (RFS), but the overall tone from industry associations responding immediately after the EPA announcement was negative.

Growth Energy co-chairs Jeff Broin and Tom Buis emphasized the progress made in piercing the blend wall. The initial proposal two years ago went backwards, Buis pointed out, and the revised proposal in May was an improvement, but still below a 10 percent blend. The final rule will push that over 10 percent.

But while pleased that the blend wall was pierced, Broin said the methodology is still troubling. “We remain concerned that the final rule continues to rely on the ‘distribution waiver’ that redefines supply as demand and was rejected by Congress when the RFS was enacted into law. Of particular concern is that by using such a waiver, the oil industry is being rewarded for its unwillingness to follow the law and invest in infrastructure to move toward cleaner, renewable fuel, which sets a dangerous precedent for the future of the program.”

The Renewable Fuels Association was more direct in expressing its displeasure. “EPA’s decision today turns our nation’s most successful energy policy on its head,” Renewable Fuels Association president and CEO Bob Dinneen said in a statement. The agency increased the blending requirements for 2016 across the board, to a total of 18.1 billion gallons, including 14.5 billion gallons of undifferentiated biofuels or corn ethanol and 230 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol.

The RFA criticized the numbers being lowered from the 15 billion specified in the law. “Data shows that EPA, in its initial RFS proposal, understated the likely market for E85 and non-ethanol conventional biofuels in 2016 by at least 440 million gallons. The data suggests there will be at least 14.7 billion gallons of undifferentiated renewable fuel blended next year. With approximately 2 billion surplus RIN credits already available for refiners to use for compliance in 2016, and with another 900 million RINs potentially becoming available from 2015 over-compliance, the EPA’s decision to lower the 2016 RVO below the statutorily imposed level of 15 billion gallons is simply unnecessary.”

Brian Jennings, the executive vice president of the American Coalition for Ethanol, called the methodology for setting blending targets for 2015 and 2016 legally questionable. “When Congress enacted the renewable fuel standard it voted to side with those of us who said ‘yes we can’ reduce greenhouse gas emissions from motor fuel, ‘yes we can’ allow consumer access to E15 and flex fuels, and ‘yes we can’ spark innovative ways to produce cleaner fuels,” said Jennings. “While we appreciate that the administration made incremental improvements compared to the proposed RFS rule, unfortunately, today they are choosing to side with those who say ‘no, we can’t. Regrettably, EPA’s final RFS rule protects the old way of doing business by obstructing consumer access to cleaner fuels, stifling competition in the marketplace, and undermining innovation.”

The National Corn Growers Association said while it was pleased to see the EPA revise its proposed volumes, “the fact remains that any reduction in the statutory amount will have a negative impact on our economy, our energy security, and the environment. It is unfortunate that Big Oil’s campaign of misinformation continues to carry weight in the court of public opinion, and in this decision,” NCGA president Chip Bowling said in a statement. “In light of the EPA’s decision, we are evaluating our options. We will fight to protect the rights of farmers and consumers and hold the EPA accountable.”

The Urban Air Initiative called it not disappointing but not surprising. The industry needs to establish markets for ethanol and recognize that the highest value of ethanol is that it is clean, high-octane fuel that can reduce toxic compounds in gasoline and harmful emissions. Instead, UAI president Dave VanderGriend said EPA’s action should be a message to the ethanol industry that it needs to secure its own future and recognize that ethanol’s highest value is as a clean fuel that can provide high octane to reduce the toxic compounds in gasoline while reducing a range of harmful emissions. "This is simply one program,” VanderGriend said. “We can move well beyond that and we will not let EPA and its faulty, inaccurate models define our value and limit our growth.”

The Iowa Renewable Fuels Association executive director Monte Shaw called the announcement a “gut punch” for consumers and farmers. “Given EPA’s stated rationale for these numbers, one of the most successful energy policies in our nation’s history has been put squarely in the stranglehold of the petroleum industry,” Shaw said. “As a result, consumers will see higher prices at the pump and Iowa farmers will likely continue to see commodity prices below the cost of production.”

Todd Sneller, Nebraska Ethanol Board administrator and Clean Fuels Development Coalition chairman, said the rule “essentially caps biofuels at 10 percent of the market,”

“The RFS was, and remains, a foundation to provide a solid base for biofuels to continue to develop,” Sneller said. “All this means is EPA will limit the amount of biofuels they intend to manage under this particular program. Ethanol's high octane and cleaner-burning properties make it an extremely valuable fuel and we expect increasing demand for those reasons.”

The National Biodiesel Board was pleased with the increase in the biodiesel volumes in the RVO. “It is a good rule,” said NBB CEO Joe Jobe in a statement. “It may not be all we had hoped for, but it will go a long way toward getting the U.S. biodiesel industry growing again and reducing our dangerous dependence on fossil fuels.” Under the new RFS rule, biomass-based diesel volumes would grow to 1.9 billion gallons in 2016 and 2 billion gallons in 2017. The biomass-based diesel category—a diesel subset of the overall advanced biofuel category—is made up mostly of biodiesel but also includes renewable diesel, another diesel alternative made from the same feedstocks using a different technology. “The new standards reflect modest but meaningful growth over recent years when the U.S. market has hovered around 1.8 billion gallons annually,” the NBB statement noted. Biodiesel is produced in nearly every state, and has made up the vast majority of advanced biofuel production under the RFS. Advanced biofuels must demonstrate a 50 percent greenhouse gas reduction.

Michael McAdams, speaking for the Advanced Biofuels Association said the group “applauds EPA’s support of next-generation biofuels. Today’s final rule is a step in the right direction that recognizes the importance of growing supplies of advanced and cellulosic biofuels to help provide more sustainable fuels for our future to combat climate issues.” McAdams reiterated the organization’s belief that legislative reform is needed. To strengthen the RFS and expedite the production of advanced biofuels. “. Outdated definitions, cellulosic waivers, as well as overall program uncertainty have created significant barriers to entry for the advanced and cellulosic industry.”

The Biotechnology Industry Organization called the final rule “an unnecessary, unlawful about face for a program that was successfully driving development of cleaner biofuel technologies and reduction of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. The rule undermines the goals of the statute, and it will continue to undercut investment in advanced and cellulosic biofuels and increase greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation fuel sector.” Brent Erickson, executive vice president of BIO’s Industrial and Environmental Section, called it a severe blow to consumers and the biofuels industry and said the EPA’s actions violate the law. By delaying the EPA created uncertainty and shook investor confidence, resulting in an estimated $13.7 billion investment shortfall in the advanced biofuel sector and this final rule exacerbates the problem.

“As EPA has acknowledged, its delay allowed obligated parties to act as though the law did not exist,” Erickson said. “The delay increased U.S. carbon emissions by millions of tons over the past two years, compared to what could have been achieved with required use of biofuels. As the United States enters negotiations with the rest of the world to limit greenhouse gas emissions, EPA is putting in place an RFS rule that will sacrifice achievable reductions of emissions in the transportation sector.”

Brooke Coleman, excecutive editor of the Advanced Biofuels Business Council, said while the final rule would require oil companies to blend higher amounts of renewable fuel than originally proposed, which could have a positive effect, "it fails to remedy critical RFS waiver issues that are undercutting investment in the low carbon, advanced biofuels. First, the final rule continues to rely on a new reading of the statute to allow for 'distribution waivers,' which now permits EPA to waive the RFS from year-to-year if the oil industry refuses to make arrangements to distribute renewable fuel and comply with the law. Second, the final rule does not make clear how or on what timeline the agency expects to address waivers in the cellulosic biofuel pool, which currently allow the oil industry to avoid buying cellulosic biofuel in favor of cellulosic waiver credits (CWCs) at the end of each compliance year. Both issues should and can be resolved in 2016."

Read the original story: Renewable Fuel Associations Express Mixed Reactions To Final Rule

EPA Sets 2016 Blending Targets for Ethanol and Other Biofuels

Minneapolis Star Tribune

November 30, 2015

By Dave Shaffer

More biofuel will be required to be blended into the nation's fuel supply next year, but the ethanol industry isn't entirely happy about it.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Monday issued final blending requirements under a 2007 renewable fuels law, ordering distributors to mix 8 billion gallons of ethanol, biodiesel and other advanced biofuels into the nation's fuel supply next year.

For the first time, the overall U.S. mandate for corn-based ethanol — about 14.5 billion gallons — will exceed 10 percent of the nation's expected gasoline use. That's intended to spur expansion of higher ethanol blends, such as 15 percent ethanol, or E15, which is now sold at just 36 Minnesota stations.

Almost all regular gasoline in the nation is a 10 percent ethanol blend, and that won't change.

For the ethanol industry, this overall market share has been called the "blend wall" — a barrier to selling more biofuel.

"We have seen a break in the blend wall," said Jeff Broin, chief executive of Poet Inc., the nation's second-largest ethanol producer with four plants in Minnesota.

Broin, who also is chairman of Growth Energy, an ethanol trade group, said the EPA's decision "should move renewable fuels forward." On a conference call, Broin said about 5,000 U.S. fuel stations are on track to install equipment to dispense E15, and he expects the higher-ethanol blend to sell at a discount to regular gasoline. In Minnesota, E15 typically sells for about 10 cents less than unleaded regular.

The 2016 corn-ethanol level is below the 15 billion gallons envisioned in the 2007 law — and is about 1 billion gallons less than the annual capacity of the nation's 212 ethanol plants.

Other ethanol industry leaders and supporters criticized the EPA's decision. The Minnesota Corn Growers called it a "step backward" and the Minnesota Biofuels Association, a state trade group, called it "capitulation to the oil industry" — echoing similar comments from the Renewable Fuels Association, an ethanol trade group based in Washington.

Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., said the EPA biofuel targets are too low, even though they are higher than the agency proposed earlier this year. "[W]hile I'm glad they raised levels from what was proposed, these final numbers just don't cut it — especially for ethanol," Franken said in a statement.

Oil industry groups, which have fought expanding market share of ethanol, also were critical. "This decision is hard to view as anything other than an attempt by EPA to placate the biofuels lobby," said Chet Thompson, president of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers.

Minnesota has 21 corn-ethanol plants, although two are shifting production to other corn-based biochemicals or fuel. Tim Rudnicki, executive director of the Minnesota Biofuels Association, said it's too early to say what effect the EPA decision will have on the state's ethanol industry, but "It certainly seems like a negative to me," he said.

Aside from corn-ethanol, the EPA also set higher blending levels for biodiesel, or diesel fuel made from plants, and advanced biofuels. Janet McCabe, acting assistant administrator for EPA's Office of Air and Radiation, said the rule increases the advanced biofuel blending requirement by 35 percent, but recognizes that cellulosic, ethanol technology hasn't developed as quickly as envisioned by the 2007 law. Cellulosic ethanol has a lower carbon footprint than the corn-based fuel.

Three cellulosic ethanol plants have opened in the past 14 months, including two in Iowa that process non-kernel parts of corn usually left on fields. A third plant in Kansas is owned by Spain-based Abengoa, which has begun insolvency proceedings, said Scott Chabina, a director at New York-based Carl Marks Advisory Group who tracks the industry.

Chabina said the EPA cellulosic ethanol targets could help spur investment in cellulosic ethanol, but that it won't be easy.

Read the original story: EPA Sets 2016 Blending Targets for Ethanol and Other Biofuels

More...

A Big Week Ahead for RFS and Biofuels

Hoosier Ag Today

November 30, 2015

By Gary Truitt

The long awaited Paris Climate Conference gets underway this week. The purpose of the international meeting is to focus on how the world can address factors that are impacting our climate, including carbon and greenhouse gasses. Participants will also try to agree on the text of a new international treaty. Countries will discuss related matters such as forests and funding for poorer countries to deal with climate change. All of the nations are working towards the common goal of limiting greenhouse gas emissions to prevent climate change from getting out of hand. Trying to get 196 countries to agree to anything makes the process slow going.

President Obama will present recommendations from the US on how to reduce carbon and GHG. The oil lobby has been pressuring the administration not to mention biofuels or the Renewable Fuel Standard. Geoff Cooper with the RFA is hopeful the White House will mention one of the few US programs that has been successful in reducing GHG: the RFS, “We are hopeful the President will mention the RFS or renewable fuels in his speech. The RFS has been huge success in reducing carbon emissions in our transportation fuels.” The US is aiming for a reduction of at least 26 per cent below 2005 levels by 2025. How the President plans to achieve this without renewable fuels is baffling to Cooper.

Cooper admits the powerful oil lobby has been working hard to keep renewable energy out of the Paris discussions, “But we are hoping the administration will see through that fog and include the RFS in its discussions in Paris.”

Obama, who has stated he is a climate change authority, has had a mixed record on supporting the RFS and biofuels. In advanced materials sent by the US to the Paris conference, there was no mention of biofuels or the RFS.

Ironically, as the Parris conference begins, the EPA will be releasing its final rule on the level of ethanol that can be blended into gasoline. It is likely the EPA will allow less than the ethanol industry wants and can produce. The RVO rule is expected to be released on Monday.

The location for the conference moves around each year. In 1997, it was in Kyoto, where the famous Kyoto Protocol was written up. In 2009, it was in Copenhagen, a meeting which ended in anti-climax. It was decided two years ago in Warsaw that the 2015 COP21 meeting would be in Paris. Country representatives also have smaller meetings throughout the year, mostly in Bonn, Germany.

Read the original story: A Big Week Ahead for RFS and Biofuels

RFS is Crucial to National Security

November 24, 2015

By Jon Soltz

As a veteran, I’ve witnessed fellow servicemen and servicewomen risk life and limb over oil interests in hostile regions, all so we can feed our dependence on foreign oil. That’s one of the many reasons why Congress passed the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) into law in 2005. Our leaders saw American-grown renewable fuel as a way to cut our dependence on foreign oil and bolster our energy and national security. They recognized that it’s senseless to keep putting Americans in harm’s way when we are producing renewable fuel right here at home. Biofuels are crucial to our national security, and since the RFS was enacted, our dependence on foreign oil has decreased by more than 55 percent. Biofuels are also a major contributor to job growth in America, creating more than 852,000 annually.

Lowering the renewable volume requirements under the RFS, as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed several months ago, would be disastrous for our country’s energy independence and security. With ongoing instability in the Middle East and so much at stake, continuing to depend on foreign oil is not an option. The RFS is the most successful energy policy in the U.S., and producing secure renewable fuel, like ethanol, in our country is one of our most effective tools at breaking our addiction to foreign oil. But now it’s being attacked by people who only stand to gain from our foreign fossil fuel dependence: the oil industry.

The oil industry’s advocacy for continued dependence on imports from hostile foreign regions cannot be allowed to sway our nation’s energy policy. According to Brigadier General Steven Anderson, there have been 1,200 casualties among American soldiers transporting fuel in Afghanistan and Iraq. We can and must do our part to allow access to and production of homegrown biofuels to lessen our reliance on foreign oil.

America’s military has recognized that and invested in advanced biofuels to increase its diversity of energy. As the largest consumer of energy in the nation, the Department of Defense has used renewable fuel to insulate itself against price shocks in the rigged global oil market. America cannot control the price and global production of oil, but we can control the fuel we grow right here at home.

Increasingly, climate security is also playing a role in global stability. As climate change contributes to extreme weather events, we will only see further destabilization throughout the world. So it’s more important than ever that we curb our carbon emissions by diversifying our fuel supply and using increasing amounts of renewable fuel produced in America. After all, the advanced biofuels we’re producing right here at home are the cleanest motor fuels in the world.

When oil and gas production and pollution are increasingly fouling our land and water and threatening the world’s climate, we need a strong RFS to promote the production of secure energy. We have a choice between dirty oil from volatile regions of the world and homegrown renewable fuel made by America’s farmers and rural communities. We should be finding ways to cut, not increase, our use of oil, despite what the oil industry and its cronies want.

President Obama has said that, “The only way for America’s energy supply to be truly secure is by permanently reducing our dependence on oil.” We have the technology and know-how to make that happen. But we need the Administration to stop standing in the way of this progress. We can ensure our energy security and our national security by taking steps now to cut dependence on foreign energy and develop the resources in our own country.

The RFS is imperative to our national security, and we can’t let oil companies dictate the safety of our men and women in uniform. If enacted as EPA has initially proposed, the current rule would undermine efforts to break from oil and attempts to move forward with advanced biofuels. We have a solution to our dangerous oil addiction, and we can’t afford to turn back now.

Soltz is an Iraq war veteran and co-founder and chair of VoteVets.org.

Read the original story: RFS is Crucial to National Security

Ethanol Backers Enlist ‘Bachelor’ Star to Push Fuels Mandate

November 23, 2015

By Devin Henry

Corn growers have a new pitchman in their campaign to protect the federal ethanol mandate: the “Bachelor.”

Chris Soules, the former star of “The Bachelor” and a contestant on “Dancing with the Stars,” plugs the economic and environmental benefits of ethanol fuel in a new ad campaign a week before regulators are due to finalize new fuel ethanol standards.

“I’ve been able to see first-hand the benefits of renewable fuels,” Soules, a native Iowan, says in the ad.

He adds that he’s seen the “effect on my family’s enterprise and I’ve seen it affect other families who haven’t even been involved in farming, by providing jobs and cleaner energy and to help us the country diversify our energy resources."

Soules, a fourth-generation farmer, proposed to "The Bachelor" winner Whitney Bischoff at his farm during the season finale earlier this year.

The ad in which he appears, for Growth Energy, is meant to rebuff arguments from oil groups and those opposed the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) who have been running ads around the country questing the RFS’s impact on the environment.

The ad is running in Iowa, Illinois, Ohio and Indiana, all big corn-producing states. Anti-RFS groups have hit the airwaves in some of those states and others with their message against the mandate.

“This ad is more about the positive benefits of ethanol and not just the policy debate, like we’ve run before and currently are running in Washington,” said Tom Buis, the co-chairman of Growth Energy.

Federal regulators have a Nov. 30 deadline for finalizing three years of ethanol-blending requirements for gasoline. Both sides have looked to influence public opinion and policymakers on the ethanol mandate in the lead-up to the announcement, and ethanol backers are now deploying Soules to take on those opposed to the mandate.

“He is a fourth-generation farmer, and that is the real stardom, in my opinion,” Buis said.

Read the original story Ethanol Backers Enlist ‘Bachelor’ Star to Push Fuels Mandate

How We Can Free America From the Foreign Oil Cartel

St. Louis Post Dispatch

November 22, 2015

By Jim Talent

Ten years ago, Congress took an important step toward the goal of energy independence. By establishing the Renewable Fuel Standard as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Congress sent a clear message that it wanted to kick the addiction to foreign oil through a tried and true solution: American innovation. I was one of the chief authors of the RFS.

Ten years later, the RFS is the government’s most successful energy policy; in fact, it may be the government’s only successful energy policy. It has reduced dependence on foreign oil, created hundreds of thousands of jobs, and also reduced carbon emissions. Despite these achievements, the Environmental Protection Agency wants to move in another direction and actually scale back the RFS.

That’s right. The same federal agency that is promulgating costly regulations to reduce greenhouse gases also wants to weaken a program that is already reducing carbon emissions without costing the economy anything. Given the Obama administration’s emphasis on the climate change issue, the EPA’s hostility to renewable fuels only makes sense as a response to pressure from the oil industry.

The advantages of the RFS are clear. Ten percent of our fuel supply is now derived from biofuels, and our foreign oil imports are at their lowest level in 20 years. At the same time, the price of gasoline at the pump has gone down by over a dollar, in part because most gasoline contains an ethanol blend, and ethanol sells for about $1.60 per gallon. The University of Missouri Extension Service calculates that Missouri’s corn production industry generates approximately $4.3 billion in economic output and sustains 65,960 jobs. Across the river, the collective renewable fuel sector in Illinois generates $17.5 billion of total economic output annually and supports 73,156 jobs, according to the economic research firm of John Dunham & Associates.

Critics of the RFS claim that renewable fuels are subsidized. That’s not true; there are no subsidies or tax breaks for ethanol. At the time the RFS was passed, there were concerns about whether the supply of corn would be adequate to support both food and fuel production. Those of us who authored the RFS believed that it would stimulate efficiencies in corn production that would more than meet the demand. That’s happened; American farmers are growing more corn than ever before on the same amount of acreage.

Critics also claim that the RFS is an intervention in the free market. Actually, it’s the path to a free market for automobile fuel. For 40 years, the price of oil has been controlled by a foreign cartel that does not hesitate to use its market power to crush competitors.

Unsurprisingly, OPEC has already made plans to crush the U.S. oil boom, and regularly strategizes to batter competitors and dominate market share. Last November, OPEC colluded to drop oil prices so that it could squeeze competitors with higher costs. Saudi Arabia was the main architect of this strategy, driving many U.S. fracking companies out of business and into bankruptcy.

It’s alarming when you realize just how much control foreign governments and OPEC oil barons have on our everyday lives and paychecks. But they can’t exercise that power over renewable fuels, because of the RFS. The fact that the largest ethanol plant in the world just opened its doors for business in Iowa — a plant that is powered by discarded corncobs, husks and stalks — is another reminder of what American-style innovation can accomplish if it is allowed to succeed.

If you create a map of the world and size it according to oil reserves, Saudi Arabia is the biggest country by far. But if you size such a map according to agricultural production, the United States is the largest nation. That’s why the RFS was and remains such an important policy.

In the end, the RFS is not about a proposed policy change by a federal agency, it’s about who will be in charge of our nation’s energy. When you consider what is at stake, that’s something worth fighting for.

Jim Talent was U.S. senator representing Missouri from 2002 to 2007. He is the chairman of Americans for Energy Security and Innovation.

Read the original story: How We Can Free America From the Foreign Oil Cartel

Analysis : RFS2 Implementation Has Reduced GHG Emissions By 354 Million Metric Tons

Renewable Fuels Association

Nov 20, 2015

WASHINGTON — Biofuels consumed under the expanded Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) have reduced U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 354 million metric tons of CO₂-equivalent since 2008, according to a new analysis conducted by California-based Life Cycle Associates. The Renewable Fuels Association (RFA), which sponsored the study, said the findings have important implications for both the pending final rule for 2014–2016 RFS volumes and upcoming global climate talks in Paris.

“The RFS2 has resulted in significant GHG reductions, with cumulative CO₂ savings of 354 million metric tonnes over the period of implementation,” according to the report. “The GHG reductions are attributed to greater than expected savings from ethanol and other biofuels.” Specifically, the authors ascribe the larger-than-anticipated GHG emissions reductions to: technology improvements in grain ethanol production, increased consumption of low-carbon advanced biofuels, and the steadily rising carbon intensity of petroleum fuels.

Whereas the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses a 2005 petroleum “baseline” for estimating RFS2 emissions impacts, the Life Cycle Associates study uses a “dynamic” petroleum baseline that reflects the true emissions impacts associated with U.S. petroleum consumption. The report, which builds on earlier work regarding marginal petroleum emissions, states that “…the advent of new crude oil extraction and processing technologies has raised the aggregate CI of petroleum fuels above the 2005 (EPA) baseline.”

The study found that conventional corn ethanol reduced emissions by an average of 29 percent when compared to the petroleum actually used in 2008, with that reduction growing to 39 percent by 2015. Importantly, these estimates include the best available estimates of prospective “indirect land use change” emissions from Argonne National Laboratory.

For context, the estimated 352 million metric tons of avoided CO₂ emissions resulting from the RFS2 between 2008 and 2015 is equivalent to the annual emissions from 74 million passenger cars or 1.9 million railcars of coal burned. Looked at another way, the RFS2 emissions reductions are equal to the amount of carbon sequestered annually by nearly 300 million acres of forest.

“This report, which uses globally accepted GHG accounting methods, demonstrates that the RFS has been tremendously successful in reducing the carbon intensity of our transportation fuels. In fact, the study found the RFS has actually exceeded expectations in terms of GHG reduction,” said RFA President and CEO Bob Dinneen. “As the Obama Administration considers both its approach to the Paris climate talks and the 2014–2016 RFS final rule, we strongly encourage them to examine this report and think carefully about the carbon impacts of the important policy decisions they are about to make. As documented in the study, the carbon footprint of American biofuels continues to shrink, while the carbon emissions associated with petroleum continue to increase. The RFS has absolutely lived up to its promise of delivering cleaner fuels to consumers, while displacing and delaying the need for increasingly dirty sources of petroleum. Now is the time to renew our national commitment to biofuels—not to walk away from it.”

Read the study here.

What Facts are Really Facts?

Ohio's Country Journal

November 17, 2015

By Matt Reese

It can be really hard to know which way to feel about some issues because these days it seems everyone has their own set of “facts” that conclusively proves their point. The problem, of course, is that as soon as you conclusively prove a point, you run into someone else who has an entirely different set of facts that definitively proves their point, which happens to be the opposite view of the first point that was proven. Confused yet? I know I am.

One only has to sit and listen to a political debate on any issue between any candidates of any party to get all caught up in a muddled mess of my-facts-versus-your-facts. Then there is often a behind-the-scenes reporter who does a fact check on the aforementioned facts to clarify the situation. Unfortunately, more often than not, these fact checks often just compound the problem by providing another opportunity to spin the issue with a set of suspect facts about the facts.

Of course, in my line of work I see this all the time in great detail with the wide variety of complicated issues facing food and agriculture. This is certainly true in the current debate over the Environmental Protection Agency’s impending decision about the levels set in the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). The recent story by Joel Penhorwood on this issue highlights the divergent facts in the RFS debate. Here is an excerpt:

ACCF (an anti-ethanol group) Executive Vice President Dave Banks responded strongly to the outcry by Ohio ag and pro-ethanol groups.

“I think these guys sometimes get lost in this weird, parallel universe in which they actually convince themselves that this mountain of damning, definitive science and data about corn ethanol’s environmental impact doesn’t exist, or that folks don’t actually know about it,” Banks said in a statement.

That environmental impact Banks spoke of is one of negative consequence. The ACCF points to research that they say shows the production of ethanol doubles greenhouse emissions when compared to gasoline over 30 years, making it a dirtier fuel in the end — a highly disputed claim.

“It’s just misinformation,” said Ohio grain farmer Chad Kemp about the anti-RFS ads. “The things they’re saying there is no scientific backing for. They’re trying to get the people to jump on board with it and basically, their idea is to kill renewable fuels in this country.”

The heated debate over the RFS really ramped up in recent weeks with dueling ad campaigns in Ohio and Washington, D.C. highlighting very different sets of facts pertaining to ethanol’s impact on the environment, the economy and so forth. So whose facts are right?

In the end, the complexities of these various issues generally boil down to some basic truths. The key for me is getting down to those basic truths and sorting out how I feel about those. So, here are some facts about the RFS (that are really facts) that helped me to form my opinion.

Congress created and approved the RFS.
Businesses planned their investment strategies based upon the RFS.
The RFS was implemented and businesses responded as they saw fit.

While there are many more nuances to the RFS debate, for me this set of undisputable facts is reason enough to support it. The government made a deal. Regardless of whether you like the deal or not, it was made and I believe it should be upheld and seen through to fruition. Maybe this set of facts doesn’t address your primary concerns about he RFS. Here are more real facts.

Ethanol offsets the purchase of foreign oil.
Ethanol is made from corn produced by American farmers.

I would rather support farmers in the U.S. with my energy dollar than who knows who I am supporting when I use petroleum.

In the end, there is usually at least some kernel of truth in either side of these debates. Which facts matter to you? The way I sort through them is by identifying the key (and real) facts of the matter that really matter to me.

Either way, the RFS is a no-brainer in my book.

Read the original story: What Facts are Really Facts?

RFA and Growth Meet with OMB and Urge Administration to Uphold the RFS

Renewable Fuels Association

November 19, 2015

Press Release

EPA-2016-Total-RVO

At a meeting on Wednesday with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Bob Dinneen, president and CEO of the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA), and Tom Buis, CEO of Growth Energy, delivered the message that the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) is working and that there is no reason for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set the Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs) for undifferentiated renewable fuel (primarily corn ethanol) below the levels specified in the statute. EPA is expected to issue the final RFS rule for 2014–2016 on or before Nov. 30. Dinneen said data show the U.S. ethanol industry would have no problem meeting the 15 billion gallon blending level specified by the statute.

“The latest data from the Energy Information Administration show that gasoline consumption projections for 2016 have increased. In fact, EIA expects 2016 gasoline demand to achieve a nine-year high,” said Dinneen, underscoring a recent analysis by RFA. “Our calculations show that because of the uptick in gasoline demand alone, EPA must increase the 2016 RVO by 270 million gallons.

“Additionally, the EPA significantly understated the use of E85 and non-ethanol conventional renewable fuels, including non-advanced renewable diesel and biodiesel, in its proposal. Moreover, USDA’s recent Biofuels Infrastructure Program grants will give consumers greater access to higher blends of ethanol like E85 and E15 through the installation of more than 5,000 blender pumps at 1,400 fueling stations. We provided OMB with data showing that EPA has understated the likely market for E85 and non-ethanol conventional biofuels in 2016 by at least 440 million gallons. All of this suggests there will be at least 14.7 billion gallons of undifferentiated renewable fuel blended next year. With approximately 2 billion surplus RINs credits available for refiners to use for compliance with the RFS, there is simply no reason for the EPA to lower the 2016 RVO below the statutorily imposed level of 15 billion gallons.”

Buis added, “Yesterday we impressed upon OMB the importance of moving the Renewable Fuel Standard forward, not backward. This is a policy that is creating jobs, reducing our dependence on foreign oil, improving our environment, and one that is breaking the near monopoly Big Oil has on the liquid fuels transportation market, providing consumers with a choice and savings at the pump. The data is there to prove the value of the program and it shows the RFS is doing exactly what it was intended to do.”

“This meeting was really our closing argument before the administration makes its final decision. We impressed upon OMB that the oil industry’s ‘blend wall’ narrative is simply not true. The president needs to uphold the statute,” both concluded.

Read the original story: RFA and Growth Meet with OMB and Urge Administration to Uphold the RFS

Member Spotlight : Hydrite Chemical Co

Hydrite Logo JPEG

This month, we spotlight our newest vendor member, Hydrite Chemical Co. We spoke to Scott Cumming, market development manager -biofuels at Hydrite Chemical, on the company, its position in the ethanol industry and what it sees as the industry's biggest challenge.

Scott Cumming

Scott Cumming, Market Development Manager - Biofuels, Hydrite Chemical

Please tell us about Hydrite Chemical Co?

Hydrite Chemical Co., established in 1929, is one of the largest and most respected providers of chemicals and related services in the United States. We are proud to partner with hundreds of companies to help them make the best products in the world at the lowest possible cost.

Please tell us about Hydrite's role within the ethanol industry and why the company is committed to supporting the ethanol industry now and in the future?

Hydrite currently provides corn oil extraction chemistries to the ethanol industry as well as other specialty chemicals for foam control, evaporator cleaning, and many bulk chemicals. For the near future, Hydrite is leveraging its expertise in sulfur, organic, and food processing to provide additional value added products to boost the earnings potential to our customers. Specifically, Hydrite is utilizing the technical expertise derived from its diverse business units to provide antibiotic free chemistries and efficiency boosting enzymes that will allow producers to contribute more to their bottom line.

What do you see as the ethanol industry's biggest challenge?

To me, the industry's biggest challenge is battling common misconceptions and continuing to get the message out about the benefits of ethanol for our country. Just a quick story to illustrate this point, the other day I was returning my rental car at a popular international airport. The friendly customer service agent at the rental car company asked me what I was doing in the area and I mentioned that I had visited an ethanol plant. The agent was very quick (and cordial) to let me know how bad ethanol was to his company's rental cars.

"This stuff is really bad and damages these cars," he told me. Yet, when pressed (in a friendly manner), he could not remember how many vehicles, which models, or the time of the most recent damage. All he could point out was how bad ethanol was for his vehicles and lawnmowers; suggesting the origins of his misguided comments were from "anti-ethanol" organizations. He was seemingly unaware of all the immense benefits the ethanol industry has had on the US economy including job creation, the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from ethanol, and a decrease in dependence on foreign oil.

Learn more about Hydrite Chemical Co here

Page 74 of 93