In the News

Ethanol Producer Magazine

June 19, 2019

By Erin Voegele

A reported released June 11 by the All Party Parliamentary Group for British Bioethanol found that the immediate introduction of E10 in the U.K. market could save drivers approximately £100 million ($126.44 million) in 2020.

The report explains that the All Party Parliamentary Group on Bioethanol launched an inquiry into the introduction of E10 in the U.K. in March. The interim report released June 11 brings the first stage of that inquiry to a close.

According to the report, without the swift introduction of E10, the U.K. economy could lose its £1 billion ethanol industry, resulting in the loss of thousands of jobs. The loss of the British ethanol industry would also impact the country’s ability to attract additional investments for next-generation biofuels and enhanced animal feed coproducts. In addition, the loss of the U.K.’s ethanol industry would cause increased dependence on foreign sources of biofuel. Farmers would also be impacted through the loss of markets for surplus crops and the availability of ethanol coproducts used for feed.

The report stresses the introduction of E10 would assist the U.K. in achieve its greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets, noting the use of ethanol is low-cost in comparison to other options. The U.K.’s GHG reduction requirement for 2019 is currently set at 4 percent for 2019, and is set to increase to 6 percent in 2020. The group said introducing E10 could reduce the impact of that increase, which is most likely to be passed down to drivers as an increase in fuel prices. The report predicts E10 could save consumers £100 million in fuel costs. The use of E10 and higher blends of ethanol would also improve air quality.

Within the report, the group calls on the U.K. Department of Transport to publish its response to its own consultation on E10 without further delay. That consultation closed in September 2018.

The group also calls on the Secretary of State for Transport to host an emergency summit on the future of the British ethanol industry, bringing together all relevant stakeholders before the summer parliamentary recess. “This is needed in order to quickly agree the most efficient, transparent and cost effective way E10 could be introduced in the U.K. by 2020 to safeguard this industry, realize the many economic and environmental benefits it would deliver, and avoid potentially adding millions of pounds to motorist’s fuel bills,” the group said in the report.

The U.K. Renewable Energy Association released a statement welcoming the report’s findings. “E10 has a crucial role to play in the decarbonization of U.K. transport and with the correct policy support from government, could save motorists £100 million in its first year of implementation,” said Nina Skorupska, chief executive of the REA. “The electrification of passenger vehicles is gaining momentum and whilst supply chains develop and costs reduce, E10 is essential in offering cost-effective and immediate GHG savings.

“Whether meeting our legally binding climate targets or realizing the more ambitious targets of net-zero GHG by 2050, we need to utilize all technologies available and the complimentary deployment of biofuels and electrification is a perfect example of the forward thinking needed to achieve this,” Skorupska continued.

A full copy of the interim report can be downloaded from the APPG for British Bioethanol website.

Read the original article: Report: E10 Could Save UK Drivers £100 Million In 2020

Ethanol Producer Magazine

June 25, 2019

By Erin Voegele

A bipartisan group of 11 senators led by Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., sent a letter to U.S. EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler June 25 urging the agency to update an outdated environmental analysis on ethanol in order to improve foreign sales opportunities.

The letter references a report released by the USDA’s Office of Chief Economist in April that found greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from corn ethanol are 39 percent lower than gasoline vehicle fuel, and perhaps as much as 43 percent lower, depending on the refining technology. 

“This summarized report is based on a 2017 USDA comprehensive analysis that highlights the significant reductions in emissions that have come from innovations in feedstock production as well as refining processes,” the senators wore. “It raises the question as to why the [U.S. EPA] still has not revised its assessment for corn ethanol since 2010, which only shows about a 20 percent reduction for conventional, starch-based ethanol.”

In the letter, the senators “request that EPA publicly announce its intent to review and incorporate the latest GREET modeling into an updated life cycle assessment for corn ethanol and to announce a timeline by which this will be completed.”

The senators note that the change “need not require further delay or arduous analysis” as it “is only a matter of EPA formally adopting these changes.”

If there are valid reasons the change cannot be done in a timely fashion, the senators ask that the agency remove obsolete information from its website and replace it in the interim with the USDA’s analysis.

According to the senators, the U.S. Department of Energy developed the GREET model nearly 30 years ago to measure the GHG emissions of vehicle fuels. The updated model is now used by more than 30,000 professional organizations worldwide, including the Federal Aviation Administration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ford, General Motors, BP and PetroChina. EPA, however, does not currently use the updated model.

“Meanwhile, the EPA stands alone in its decade-old calculation having major implications for opening up new global markets for ethanol,” the senators wrote. “For example, until recently, Japan, which imports 99 percent of its ethanol, met those needs with Brazilian production based on Brazil’s low carbon intensity and their belief that U.S. corn ethanol did not meet their criteria for carbon intensity relative to gasoline. Not until a great effort was expended by the U.S. Grains Council in Japan to overcome the conflicting information generated by the outdated EPA model was the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry…persuaded that the latest science verifies U.S. ethanol is suitable for addressing Japan’s GHG reduction goals—creating new market opportunities for our farmers.”

The letter stresses the Brazil example is not an isolated case. While ethanol has been the fastest growing agricultural export during the past five years, the senators said the EPA’s old ethanol science is thwarting its advancements. Other nations look to EPA for technical information regarding GHG emissions on U.S. corn ethanol, wrote the senators.

“In the March 26, 2010, preamble to Renewable Fuel Standard implementing regulation, EPA committed to updating the GHG assessment for ethanol, affirmed that the science evolves, and pledged to incorporate the updated into formation into a new assessment,” the senators wrote. “The time has arrived to complete this responsibility.”

“We assert that there is little justification for EPA to maintain such an outdated calculation that otherwise could be easily corrected with existing, available analysis—and straightforwardly address an unnecessary obstacle to trade,” the continued.

In addition to Grassley and Durbin, the letter is signed by Sens. Joni Earnst, R-Iowa; Tina Smith, D-Minn.; John Thune, R-S.D.; Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisc.; Roy Blunt, R-Mo.; Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.; Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill.; Deb Fischer, R-Neb.; and Josh Hawley, R-Mo.

The American Coalition for Ethanol has spoken out to applaud the letter. “ACE extends our gratitude to Senators Durbin and Grassley for leading this bipartisan effort to hold EPA accountable on this important issue. Unlike the Argonne GREET model, EPA has not reviewed or updated their original 2010 corn ethanol greenhouse gas (GHG) assessments,” said Brian Jennings, CEO of ACE. “Current data from the GREET model indicate that corn ethanol’s carbon intensity is almost 50 percent less than petroleum gasoline providing significantly more GHG reduction benefits than when the RFS was enacted a decade ago. Last year, ACE published “The Case for Properly Valuing the Low Carbon Benefits of Corn Ethanol” recommending, as is stated in the Senators’ letter today, that EPA refer to the latest U.S. Department of Energy GREET model for life cycle analysis of corn ethanol.

“Given the all hands-on deck nature of the climate change problem, agricultural and biofuel stakeholders continue to believe that governmental policies need to properly acknowledge the role that agriculture and biofuel can play in providing near-term solutions to offsetting U.S. GHG emissions,” he continued. “One of the most direct ways to capitalize on agriculture’s ability to mitigate GHG emissions is to properly acknowledge the role U.S. farmers and ethanol producers are playing to dramatically reduce life cycle GHG emissions from corn ethanol by improving efficiencies, investing in technologies, and adopting sustainable agricultural practices.

“U.S. farmers are under tremendous financial stress from collapsing net farm income, rising expenses, ongoing trade tensions, weather-related disasters, and the undermining of the [RFS] with demand destroying small refinery waivers,” Jennings said. “Updating EPA’s decade-old modeling would be a step in the right direction to underpin the scientific and economic opportunity for ethanol use to increase via low carbon fuel markets.”

A full copy of the letter can be downloaded from Durbin’s website.

Read the original article: Senators Ask EPA to Update Ethanol Science to Improve Trade

Ethanol Producer Magazine

June 24, 2019

By Gevo

Gevo Inc. announced June 17 that Virgin Australia has used Gevo’s sustainable aviation jet fuel (SAJF) to power 1 million kilometers of flights, for all aircraft operating in and out of Brisbane Airport when the fuel was put through the general fuel supply system. This marks another important step for Virgin Australia towards building a supply-chain for the long-term commercial use of Gevo’s SAJF in Australia to lower greenhouse gas emissions.

Since the first container of SAJF was delivered to Brisbane back in August 2018, Virgin Australia has continued to work with Gevo and has welcomed three more deliveries of the SAJF since this time.

Virgin Australia Chief Legal and Risk Officer Dayna Field said the 1 million kilometers flown represents an important milestone and demonstrates that this low carbon product can go the distance. “Virgin Australia is proud to have led this initiative in Brisbane, as it has been an important step in promoting the use and production of sustainable aviation fuels in our region.” 

“We are actively looking at ways to reduce our carbon emissions and low-carbon fuels present a real opportunity. As a diversified airline group, we know that establishing a local low-carbon fuel industry will have positive environmental, social and economic impacts,” she said. 

Patrick R. Gruber, the CEO of Gevo, commented, “We are pleased to be working with Virgin Australia to get our de-fossilized, sustainable jet fuel into the Australian air. We appreciate the efforts of all the project partners, the Queensland Government, the Brisbane Airport, Caltex and DB Schenker who have all tirelessly worked to commence the transformation of the Australian jet fuel supply chain. This is a very good milestone which demonstrates the potential for the future.

Read the original article: Virgin Australia Flies 1 Million Kilometers with Gevo’s Jet Fuel

The Local

June 12, 2019

The use of biofuels for Sweden's cars and trucks will need to more than double and the use of electricity increase ten-fold if the country is to meet its goal of zero transport emissions by 2045, according to a new study.

This is how Sweden meets its climate goals for transport, a report from the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences, estimates that if the goal is to be met, the transport sector will require 25 TWh of electrical energy and as much as 40TWh of biofuels.

Currently Sweden uses about 19 TWh of biofuels and 2.6 TWh of electricity for domestic transport.

"It's not enough to talk about charging stations in central Stockholm. We are also going to need large volumes of biofuel," Karin Byman, who led the project, told The Local.

She said she was still convinced that a zero carbon transport sector was "technically possible".

"But it is a big challenge because we need to change the way we look at transport. We need to have a more transport-effective society," she said. "When we plan our cities we need to look at 'where do you have the shops, where do you have the schools?', so we don't need to have so much traffic."

Byman stressed that her argument that more energy would be needed from biofuels for transport than from electricity by 2045 did not mean electric cars would not dominate passenger transport.

"The electrical motor is so much more efficient than a normal engine, so it won't require as much electricity as an amount as cars running on biofuel will require," she explained.

By 2045 she expected most passenger cars to be electric, with biofuel used predominantly for planes, agricultural machinery, and a few of the oldest vehicles.

The increased reliance on biofuels will require new legislation to promote Swedish domestic production and cut out imports of biofuels produced unsustainably from palm oil and other sources.

"We need to look at existing regulation so we don't just ask for more cars to use biofuels, we also need to en encourage more producers of biofuels to invest in new plants," Byman said.

Sweden was capable of being self-sufficient in biofuels, she said. "We have such big forests and such a big country...There is a lot of waste from felling trees in the forests that they don't care about today because the prices are too low." 

Read the original article: Sweden 'Must Double Biofuels Use' To Meet Emissions Goal: Report

Ethanol Producer Magazine

June 14, 2019

By Erin Voegle

The U.S. Energy Information Administration released the latest edition of its Short-Term Energy Outlook June 11, increasing its forecasts for 2019 and 2020 ethanol production. The agency now predicts ethanol production will average 1.04 million barrels per day this year and 1.05 million barrels per day next year. Production averaged 1.05 million barrels per day in 2018.

The June forecasts represent an increase over production levels predicted by EIA last month. In its May STEO, the EIA predicted 2019 ethanol production would average 1.03 million barrels per day, with 2020 production increasing to an average of 1.04 million barrels per day.  

On a quarterly basis, the EIA currently predicts ethanol production will average 1.05 million barrels per day during the second quarter of this year, falling to 1.04 million barrels per day during the third and fourth quarters. In 2020, production is expected to average 1.04 million barrels per day during the first quarter, increase to 1.06 million barrels per day in the second quarter, and fall to 1.05 million barrels per day in the third and fourth quarters.

Ethanol consumption is currently expected to average 950,000 barrels per day in both 2019 and 2020, up from 940,000 barrels per day in 2018.

The EIA’s most recent production data shows ethanol production reached 1.096 million barrels per day the week ending June 7, up from 1.044 million barrels per day the prior week.

Ethanol stocks fell to 21.802 million barrels the week ending June 7, down from 22.553 million barrels the previous week.

The EIA’s most recent weekly data shows the U.S imported 251,000 barrels of ethanol in March, all from Brazil. The U.S. exported 3.335 million barrels of ethanol in March, primarily to Brazil, Canada and India.

Read the original article: EIA Increases 2019, 2020 Ethanol Production Forecasts

Ethanol Producer Magazine

By Matt Thompson

June 11, 2019

Novozymes, a yeast and enzyme provider, announced this week at the Fuel Ethanol Workshop and Expo it’s new products: Fortiva, a new alpha-amylase, and Innova Force, a new yeast that is part of the Innova platform announced by Novozymes last year.

“With Force, we have an even stronger genetic backbone that delivers more robustness, but tolerates even higher temperatures than our previous yeasts, Drive and Lift, did,” said Brian Brazeau, vice president of biofuels commercial North America for Novozymes. “It has advanced enzyme activities that the industry would expect from Novozymes that the industry has never seen before, enabling more residual starch conversion, which ethanol producers would see as lower residual starch.”

Another innovation Force brings to the market is that it’s available in both dry and cream form. “We’re really excited to be able to bring customers the choice of being able to use dry yeast without having to compromise performance compared to cream,” Brazeau said.

Fortiva allows producers to use high temperatures during liquefaction, while maintaining enzyme performance, according to Brazeau “In the past, if ethanol producers wanted to run at higher temperatures, they could trade off with the overall performance of the enzyme and wouldn’t solubilize as much starch, which shows up for an ethanol producer as lower starch conversion and lower ethanol yields,” he said. “With our enzyme, they don’t have to make that tradeoff anymore.”

Brazeau said innovation at Novozymes continues. “We already have other next generation yeasts that we’re testing in the market, and we have a number of different enzyme molecules, both alpha-amylase and glucoamylases and complementary activities that we’re also testing in the market,” he said. “So, we are really pushing to bring even new innovations beyond these. This is certainly not the end.”

Read the original article: Novozymes Unveils New Alpha-Amylase, Yeast at FEW

DuPont

Press Release

June 11, 2019

DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences (DuPont) has announced the launch of DuPont™ OPTIMASH® DCO+ for increased recovery of corn oil in dry grind ethanol plants. OPTIMASH® DCO+ provides a flexible solution for ethanol producers to increase corn oil yield without affecting downstream processes or the quality of distillers’ grains.

OPTIMASH® DCO+ is a patent-pending thermostable protease dosed into liquefaction, where it helps to liberate corn oil from the protein and fiber matrix of the corn kernel. Because it is a stand-alone product, ethanol producers can precisely dose OPTIMASH® DCO+ without having to change their alpha amylase.

“We strongly believe that the precision and performance offered by OPTIMASH® DCO+ is the right tool to help ethanol producers achieve additional profitability through greater corn oil yield,” said Troy Wilson, Global Industry Leader for the XCELIS™ Ethanol Solutions platform at DuPont. “We are excited to deliver this innovation for the ethanol industry.”

OPTIMASH® DCO+ is a part of the XCELIS™ Ethanol Solutions platform by DuPont.

About DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences

DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences applies expert science to advance market-driven, healthy and sustainable solutions for the food, beverage, dietary supplement and pharmaceutical industries. We also use cutting-edge biotechnology across a range of markets to advance bio-based solutions to meet the needs of a growing population, while protecting our environment for future generations. We are innovative solvers who help our customers turn challenges into high-value business opportunities. For more information: www.dupontnutritionandhealth.com or www.biosciences.dupont.com.

About DuPont

DuPont (NYSE: DD) is a global innovation leader with technology-based materials, ingredients and solutions that help transform industries and everyday life. Our employees apply diverse science and expertise to help customers advance their best ideas and deliver essential innovations in key markets including electronics, transportation, construction, water, health and wellness, food, and worker safety. More information can be found at www.dupont.com/.

Read the original press release: DuPont launches OPTIMASH® DCO+ at 2019 International Fuel Ethanol Workshop & Expo

Senator Amy Klobuchar

Press Release

June 11, 2019

Today, U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) led a group of 12 senators in urging Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Andrew Wheeler to cease issuing so-called “hardship” waivers. These waivers are intended to help small refineries by exempting obligated parties from the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued dozens of waivers, including to some large and profitable oil companies, undermining the original intent of the RFS. In their letter, the senators also requested that the EPA immediately reallocate the remaining gallons and make public the information regarding any recipients of these exemptions.

Klobuchar and Duckworth were joined on the letter by Senators Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Tina Smith (D-MN), Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), and Ron Wyden (D-OR).

“We are extremely concerned about the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) recent actions to continue to improperly grant small refinery hardship waivers under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). EPA’s continued manipulation and misuse of the small refiner waiver authority is undermining the integrity of the RFS and disadvantaging farmers,” the senators wrote. “Rather than follow congressional intent in the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and follow through on the promises made to rural America, the EPA and the Administration are providing waivers, in secret, to help some of the largest oil companies and refiners evade their compliance obligations under the Clean Air Act.

“The small refiner waiver provision was not intended to undermine the RFS to the benefit of the most profitable oil companies in the world. We request that you cease issuing any further small refinery exemptions, immediately reallocate the remaining gallons, and make public the information regarding any recipients of these exemptions.”

The full text of the letter can be found below:

Dear Administrator Wheeler:

We are extremely concerned about the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) recent actions to continue to improperly grant small refinery hardship waivers under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). EPA’s continued manipulation and misuse of the small refiner waiver authority is undermining the integrity of the RFS and disadvantaging farmers.

Biofuels are a key pathway toward decarbonizing the transportation sector while lowering gas prices, driving economic growth, and creating jobs. Every gallon of biofuels we use displaces a gallon of oil and cuts carbon emissions. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) found that first generation biofuels cut greenhouse gas emissions by 43 percent, and Argonne National Lab reports that cellulosic biofuels cut GHG emissions between 70 percent and 126 percent.

Competition also helps to reduce prices, and the gasoline market is no exception. As of June 7, 2019, the price of gas with 10 percent ethanol is 20 cents cheaper than gas without ethanol.

Yet, rather than follow congressional intent in the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and follow through on the promises made to rural America, the EPA and the Administration are providing waivers, in secret, to help some of the largest oil companies and refiners evade their compliance obligations under the Clean Air Act.

Ethanol prices have fallen to their lowest levels in over a decade. Renewable Identification Numbers (RIN) prices are down more than 80 percent as compared to last year, providing massive relief to refiners choosing to buy credits to comply with the RFS rather than produce renewable fuels. In fact, one oil refiner re-allocated its savings from lower RIN prices and purchased three ethanol plants, calling into question why refineries really needed these savings if they were not being used to lower expenses or pay employees. 

Since 2017, refinery waivers have increased to the clear benefit of the oil industry. Over the last two years, more than 50 small refinery waivers have been issued, eliminating demand for more than 2.6 billion gallons of biofuels. There are 39 waiver applications currently awaiting action at EPA. If these are granted, it will only exacerbate this problem.

Every waiver granted negatively impacts the rural economy. At a time when farm family incomes are at their lowest levels since 2006, the improper issuance of small refinery waivers is hurting biofuel producers and farmers across the United States. In fact, Secretary of Agriculture Perdue described these waivers as “demand destruction.”

Finally, recent news reports indicate that the EPA’s proposal to make the names of refineries receiving the exemptions public may be in question due to White House interference in the regulatory process on behalf of refiners.

The small refiner waiver provision was not intended to undermine the RFS to the benefit of the most profitable oil companies in the world. We request that you cease issuing any further small refinery exemptions, immediately reallocate the remaining gallons, and make public the information regarding any recipients of these exemptions. Thank you for your attention to this critical issue.

Sincerely,

Read the original press release: Klobuchar, Duckworth Lead Letter Urging the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Cease Issuing Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) ‘Hardship’ Waivers